[I. Call to Order]
[00:00:07]
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. LET ME. WELCOME. WELCOME, ALL OF YOU, TO THE THIS MEETING OF THE TYLER CITY COUNCIL OR TYLER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, NOT THE CITY COUNCIL. WE'RE ALWAYS HAPPY TO HAVE OUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS HERE TO SPEAK ON ISSUES THAT ARE IMPORTANT TO THEM. CONCERNING PLANNING AND ZONING. OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS A ROLL CALL. YES, SIR. CARLENE. DARK BAYS PRESENT. CLINT. CHILDS. PRESENT. PHILIP. HUMBER. PRESENT. CHRISTINA DAVIS. PRESENT. MICHAEL CARMICHAEL. PRESENT. WARD MARTINEZ PRESENT. AND DAVID HUDSON PRESENT. ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION ARE HERE. WE HAVE A FULL A FULL HOUSE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ANY ITEM APPROVED TODAY WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING. EXCUSE ME. ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 27TH, 2025, COMMENCING AT 9 A.M. IF YOU RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR THIS MEETING, YOU ALSO HAVE RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. IF ANY ITEM IS DENIED, THE APPLICANT IS TEN CALENDAR DAYS. TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE APPEAL WILL BE WILL THEN BE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST AN ITEM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. COMMENTS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES OR LESS. ALL EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE GRANTED BY THE CHAIR UPON REQUEST, AND PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM TO DO THAT. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS MEETING, WE'LL HAVE A WORKSHOP, AS WE ALWAYS DO, TO PLAN FOR THE NEXT MEETING, AND IT WILL BE HELD ACROSS THE STREET AT THE TYLER DEVELOPMENT CENTER, 423 WEST FERGUSON, IN THE LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM. AND AGAIN, THAT
[IV. Consideration of minutes from the Commission meeting of July 1, 2025]
THAT MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. OUR NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS IS CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES FROM THE JULY 1ST MEETING. COMMISSIONERS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE. MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE WE APPROVE MINUTES FROM JULY 2ND MOTION'S BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THOSE MINUTES. ANY COMMENTS, ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE.[V.1. A25-001 LC QOZB LP (4344 MACNAB DRIVE)]
ANY OPPOSED? MINUTES ARE APPROVED. THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS A 25 TO 0 ZERO ONE LC Q OH, I FEEL LIKE I'M READING MY CHART OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SSISDB LP FOR THREE, FOUR, FOUR MCMAHON DRIVE. KYLE. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. THIS FIRST ITEM IS A REQUEST FOR A AN ANNEXATION OF 3.55 ACRES OF LAND. THIS IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF OLD ROMAN ROAD AND COUNTY ROAD 2120, OR OLD BASCOM ROAD. THE REQUEST IS TO ANNEX. THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY BEEN DEVELOPED WITH 32, A 32 UNIT GATED DEVELOPMENT. AND DEVELOPED OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS. AS YOU SEE HERE. AND SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ANNEXATION. THIS IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. IT'S BEING MADE ON. AT THE PETITION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. THEY ARE REQUESTING TO ANNEX THIS PROPERTY TO BRING IT INTO THE CITY LIMITS, WHICH WILL BRING ALSO BRING IT INTO CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER FIVE. AND THEN WE'LL ALSO THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS TO ESTABLISH ZONING OF PLANNED MULTIFAMILY PMF ZONING. THIS WILL ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BUT UTILIZE A PRIVATE WAY FOR, FOR ACCESS FOR THE LOTS AND IS A PRIVATE SUBDIVISION. AND SO AND THAT'S WHAT THE APPLICANT PLANS TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY AND WILL AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE TO REFLECT TOWNHOME GARDENING APARTMENT. AS I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY, THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT HAS 3032 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AND THEY PLAN TO SUBDIVIDE EACH UNIT ONTO INDIVIDUAL LOTS. IN THE PAST A LOT OF THIS WAS DONE THROUGH CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP, BUT THEY DO PLAN TO SUBDIVIDE IT INTO ACTUAL LOTS FOR POTENTIALLY FOR SALE TO INDIVIDUAL OWNERS. THE PROPOSED PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY ZONING FOR THIS WILL ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO OR THE INTENDED TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT TO CONTINUE FOR THE APPLICANT. TYPICALLY IT[00:05:03]
WOULD NOT BE OR SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO SET A PRECEDENT FOR ANY NEW NEW DEVELOPMENTS UTILIZING MULTIFAMILY ZONING. THIS IS REALLY JUST THE BEST THING TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONTINUE WITH THEIR THEIR PLAN FOR THE, FOR THE SITE, BUT ALSO TO BRING IT INTO THE CITY LIMITS AS WELL. IT DOES HAVE A SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH IT, AS YOU SEE HERE, SHOWING THE INTENT HERE. AND THERE'S A GATED ENTRANCE ONTO MCNABB DRIVE WILL NOT HAVE ANY DIRECT ACCESS ONTO OLD OMEN. OR OR THE COUNTY ROAD EITHER. SO AGAIN THIS IS TO THIS IS A REQUEST TO ANNEX THE PROPERTY INTO THE CITY LIMITS ON PETITION OF THE OWNER. AS YOU SEE HERE, THIS IS THE DEVELOPMENT, THIS FORGOT TO GO BACK. THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL. TO THE EAST. THERE IS SOME OTHER TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS BUT ALSO SOME WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. SO IT SEEMS IT SEEMS RATHER FITTING FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, GIVEN THAT THERE IS OTHER MULTIFAMILY IN THIS AREA. OF THE NOTICES THAT WERE SENT OUT TO NEIGHBORS WITHIN 200FT, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ANNEXATION REQUEST, AND THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION OF THE CITY LIMITS AND TO ADOPT FUTURE OR THE FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE AND SINGLE EXCUSE ME AS TOWNHOUSE, GARDENING, APARTMENT AND ORIGINAL ZONING PLAN. MULTIFAMILY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IF NOT, ARE THERE I DON'T I DON'T HAVE ANYBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK OR THE PERSONS HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR AGAINST. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO SAY, SIR? NO, SIR. I'LL GET AROUND THAT. HE'S LIKE THAT. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE, IF THERE. UNLESS. WOULD YOU, SIR? WOULD YOU? JUST FOR THE RECORD, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. COREY NOONE, I'M THE OWNER OF LC. LC QSB. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO. YEAH. ADDRESS. ADDRESS 4344 MCNABB DRIVE. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? IF NOT, THANKS. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. JUST SAY IT IS FULLY DEVELOPED. THERE'S NO OTHER PHASES. WHATEVER. IT'S A COMPLETED PROJECT. AGAIN, THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND TIME AND PRESENCE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, IS THERE A COMMISSIONER WHO'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? ARE WE DOING ONE OR BOTH? WE'RE JUST GOING TO DO THE ANNEXATION FIRST. MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE. WE APPROVE THE 25 001 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ANNEXATION REQUEST. IS THERE ANY COMMENTS? QUESTIONS? MOTION'S BEEN MADE AND SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THE ANNEXATION IS APPROVED. NEXT IS PD 20 5-015[V.2. PD25-015 LC QOZB LP (4344 MACNAB DRIVE)]
WITH A LOT OF LETTERS AFTER THAT ON MCNABB DRIVE. AND THIS IS RELATED TO THE ZONING ANNEXATION ITEM WE JUST DID CALL. AND SINCE IT'S RELATED TO THE SAME SAME PROPERTY OR THE SAME DEVELOPMENT, THIS STRIP OF LAND HERE IS CURRENTLY ZONED R1, A, AND THIS REQUEST WILL OR IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THIS TO PMF TO MATCH THE REST OF THE PROPERTY TO MATCH THE SAME SITE PLAN AS THE REST OF THE PROPERTY. AND APPEARANCE THAT THE UNITS THAT WERE DEVELOPED IN THIS STRETCH HERE WERE. WE'RE NOT DONE UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING, WHICH IS R1 A WHICH WOULD NOT ALLOW ALLOW FOR THIS. I THINK THERE'S SOME DISCREPANCY OVER WHERE THE CITY LIMIT LINE WAS, BUT IN THIS REQUEST WILL CLEAR THAT UP. AND ESSENTIALLY BRING ALL THIS, THIS PROPERTY TOGETHER AND ADDRESS THAT ISSUE. AS I'VE MENTIONED BEFORE, AS PART OF THE SAME DEVELOPMENT, IT'S THE SAME AREA AS BEFORE, COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST. AND THEN THERE'S MULTIFAMILY TO THE NORTH. THE THIS IS THE SAME SITE PLAN. IT'S JUST THAT SCRIPT THERE THAT'S GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS PERTAINING TO. AND IN THE END IT'S ALL GOING TO FIT TOGETHER. THE OF THE NOTICES[00:10:02]
THAT WERE SENT OUT. NONE OF THEM ARE IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST. SIMILAR TO THE OTHER REQUEST. AND THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IF NOT, ARE THE PERSONS HERE YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, IS THERE A COMMISSIONER YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE? PD 20 5-015. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION, IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ZONING CHANGES IS APPROVED. THANKS FOR YOUR YOUR PRESENCE HERE. NEXT IS C 25 003[V.3. C25-003 MARCUS WYNNE & STEPHANIE MURPHY (AN UNIMPROVED ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY)]
MARCUS MARCUS NGUYEN AND STEPHANIE MURPHY. AN UNIMPROVED ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY. YES, SIR.GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. YES. GOOD AFTERNOON. COMMISSIONERS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE CLOSURE TO REPLAT THE RIGHT OF WAY INTO THEIR ADJACENT PROPERTY AS PART OF THEIR OWN PERSONAL PROPERTY. THE ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY THAT THE ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY THAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CLOSE IS AN IS AN UNIMPROVED AND DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE EVER BEEN UTILIZED AS AN ALLEY. THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEDICATE UTILITY EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE AS NECESSARY. AS OF FRIDAY, AUGUST 1ST, 2020, FIVE. OF THE 16 NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST TO THE REQUESTED CLOSURE. ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND ANTICIPATE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON SERVICES AND FACILITIES. BY THE PROPOSED CLOSURE REQUEST, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE CLOSURE OF THE CLOSURE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY, SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY BEING REPLATTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? IF. IF NOT, ARE THE PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? WE'RE HERE. JUST, JUST JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD SO WE'LL KNOW WHO. MARCUS NGUYEN, DEPUTY MURPHY SITTING RIGHT THERE. WE'RE HERE. HE DID A GOOD JOB OF EXPLAINING IT. THE ALLEYWAY NEEDS TO BE CLEANED UP.
AND WE'VE BEEN DOING IT FOR A LITTLE WHILE NOW. SO WE JUST DECIDED TO MAKE IT LEGAL TO CLEAN IT UP. WELL. WELL, WE'RE THANKFUL FOR THAT. STATE YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE. 1907 NORTH GLENWOOD BOULEVARD. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? IF NOT, THANK YOU. THANK YOU BOTH, BOTH OF YOU, FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ANY OTHERS? IS THERE A COMMISSIONER LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM PD TWO. I'M SORRY, C25003. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION, IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED ITEM IS APPROVED. GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR ALLEY CLEANING PROJECT.
[V.4. PD25-014 MEZAYEK BUILDING LTD (A 23.33 ACRE PORTION OF 2571 WEST GRANDE BOULEVARD)]
WE'RE WE'RE FOR YOU. NEXT IS PD 25 2014 MRG BUILDING LIMITED. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS.THIS REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE ZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO PMF PLANNED MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT. IT IS LOCATED SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF CROW ROAD AND OAK HILL BOULEVARD. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONING CHANGE TO DEVELOP A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED PER PLANNED UNIT. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PMF PLAN MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT AND ARE DEVELOPED WITH MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE EAST ARE ZONED C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND ARE UNDEVELOPED OR DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL USES. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH ARE ZONED LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND C-2, AND UNDEVELOPED. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE ZONED PMF AND ARE UNDEVELOPED AS WELL. THE FUTURE LAND USE WOULD BE AMENDED FROM SINGLE MEDIUM LOW DENSITY TO TOWNHOUSE GARDEN APARTMENTS. THE SITE PLAN PROPOSES 126 ATTACHED TOWNHOMES AT A DENSITY OF 5.4 UNITS PER ACRE. CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBDIVISION WILL OCCUR IN TWO PHASES. THE PROPOSED SETBACKS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ARE 20FT IN THE FRONT, TEN FEET ON THE REAR, AND ZERO FEET FOR INTERIOR SIDES AND TEN FEET ON SIDE CORNER LOTS, AND FOR THE HEIGHT IT WOULD BE 42FT. THE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS IS TEN
[00:15:06]
FEET. SIGNAGE, LANDSCAPING AND PARKING WILL COMPLY WITH THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. OF THE 11 NOTICES MELT, ONE NOTICE WAS RETURNED IN FAVOR AND TWO WERE RETURNED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST FOR A TOTAL. A TOTAL TOTAL PROTEST CALCULATION OF 1.25%. THE OPPOSITION STATED CONCERNS OF TRAFFIC AND DENSITY. STAFF HAS PERFORMED A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE REQUEST, AND FINDS THAT IT IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVAL CRITERIA. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. THANK YOU AND ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF. I HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING THE STUDIES DONE FOR THE TRAFFIC AND KNOWING THAT CROW ROAD COMES OUT TO OLD JACKSONVILLE AND OAK HILL COMES SOUTH. THOSE STUDIES THAT WERE DONE INTERNALLY THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN APPROVED WITH THE TRAFFIC COUNT, AND THOSE ROADS CAN SUSTAIN THAT DENSITY. WE DIDN'T RECEIVE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR THOSE ROADS. SO I DON'T THINK WE'VE. IF. WITH THIS BEING THE SITE PLAN, IF IT DOES MEET THE THRESHOLD FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, WHICH THIS LEVEL OF DENSITY IS UNLIKELY, IT WOULD THEN THERE'S NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR A TIA. OKAY. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THE PERSON'S HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, MR. MOSAIC. I'LL ASK A QUESTION. DOCTOR, ARE THERE OTHER PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK? YES, SIR.MY NAME IS. MY NAME IS DAVE DIXON. I LIVE AT 6187 HAMILTON MEADOWS WAY. JUST LEARNED THAT THERE ARE GOING TO BE TOWNHOMES. 126. IS THAT CORRECT? PROPOSED. YEAH. AND SO MY QUESTION IS, WOULD THERE BE ACCESS ROADS TO THE PROPOSED PROPERTY ON CROW ROAD, OAK HILL BOULEVARD OR BOTH? THE REASON I ASK THAT IS BECAUSE THERE'S ALREADY 75 HOMES AT HAMILTON MEADOWS. THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 85 HOMES ON COTTAGES ON CROW BEING PROPOSED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. AND THEN WITH ANOTHER 126 HOMES, THAT'S 287 HOMES ACCESSING AND UTILIZING CROW ROAD, OLD JACKSONVILLE HIGHWAY COMING HERE THIS TODAY IN ORDER TO TURN LEFT TO HEAD NORTH OFF OF CROW ROAD ONTO OLD JACKSONVILLE HIGHWAY, I HAD TO SIT THERE BETWEEN 5 AND 6 MINUTES, AND THAT WAS ONLY ONE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME, ONLY ONE TRYING TO ALSO MAKE A LEFT HAND TURN. IF YOU ADD WITH OUR LIMITED 76 PLUS, YOU'VE GOT THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES RIGHT THERE ON OLD JACKSONVILLE HIGHWAY, THE CADILLAC DEALERSHIP, 1836 RESTAURANT, AND OTHER PEOPLE UTILIZING THAT ACCESS. I DON'T THINK THAT THERE'S A GOING TO BE AN ACCEPTABLE WAY TO GET IN AND OUT OF THERE IF THERE'S NOT SOME KIND OF TRAFFIC CONTROL. THE OTHER THING IS THAT IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THAT INTERSECTION, I MEAN. NOT 100 YARDS HEAVY, HEAVY, HEAVY COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES, RESTAURANTS, BANKS, APARTMENT HOMES, EVERYTHING ELSE. AND IT TOOK 5 TO 6 MINUTES TO GET THE LEFT HAND TURN HEADED TOWARDS THE MEETING TODAY. IF THERE WERE CARS IN THE MIDDLE LANE TRYING TO MAKE A LEFT HAND TURN ONTO CROW ROAD, THAT WOULD HAVE EXTENDED IT EVEN FURTHER, AND I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE TO HAVE 287 HOMES IN THAT AREA WITHOUT SOME KIND OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL. SO THAT'S SOME OF MY CONCERNS. WHAT WAS THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS THAT WERE BEING PROJECTED OR PROPOSED? THE MAXIMUM OF 42, 42FT MAXIMUM. I WAS JUST CURIOUS. SO ANYWAY, THAT'S THAT ANSWERS. I GOT SEVERAL OF MY QUESTIONS ANSWERED, BUT I STILL AM CONCERNED ABOUT THAT INTERSECTION. WELL, WE. ANY
[00:20:01]
QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? WE'RE THANKFUL. EXCUSE ME FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE AND WE'LL TRY TO GET SOME OF YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED. MR. MOSAIC, I THINK THIS IS YOUR TIME. THANK YOU SIR. GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS. MR. CHAIRMAN. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS SAM MOSAIC, LIVE AT MY OFFICE AT 112 EAST HERITAGE IN TYLER. THIS IS OUR DEVELOPMENT. VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT MR. DIXON AND HIS WIFE LIVE IN. WE DO HAVE TWO ENTRANCES. ONE ON PROPOSED ON CROWE, ANOTHER ONE ON OAK HILL. YEAH. RIGHT. YEAH. THANK YOU. KYLE, ARE YOU DOING THAT? IT WAS.WHOEVER'S DOING IT. DO IT AGAIN, SIR. AND SLOWLY. YEAH. SO I CAN SEE AN ENTRANCE THERE ON CROWE.
AND THEN ANOTHER ENTRANCE ON OAK OAK HILL BOULEVARD. BOTH WILL BE GATED WITH WITH APPROPRIATE STACKING FOR ENTRANCE AND ALL THAT. WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD IN THE LAST LATEST REVISION OF TEX DOT'S IMPROVEMENT FOR WIDENING OLD JACKSONVILLE AT CROWE IS THAT THAT WILL BE THE ONLY WAY TO TURN LEFT FROM. IF YOU'RE NORTHBOUND ON OLD JACKSONVILLE TO TURN LEFT ONTO CROWE. AND I DON'T THINK YOU'LL BE ABLE TO TURN RIGHT TURN NORTH FROM CROWE FROM THAT POINT. SO MOST OF THE TRAFFIC WILL ACTUALLY HAVE TO COME AROUND OAK HILL, GO OUT TO EITHER GO OUT TO OAK HILL AND DOWN TO GRUNDY, OR GO TO OLD NOONDAY AND GO OUT TO 155. SO FOR NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC. I THINK WE SUBMITTED RENDERINGS OF DO Y'ALL HAVE THOSE ON THIS PACKAGE OR NOT? OKAY, WE DID SUBMIT RENDERINGS OF ELEVATIONS AND PLANS FOR NOT IN YOUR PACKET TODAY, BUT WE DID SUBMIT THEM TO THE CITY COMMISSIONER, I'D LIKE TO SEE YOU AT A JURY DUTY. THANK YOU. GOOD LORD, YOU MADE IT. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BUT THERE'S BASICALLY VERY SIMILAR TO THE DESIGN WE DID ACROSS THE STREET. AND, YOU KNOW, ACTUALLY LESS DENSITY THAN THAT COMMUNITY UNITS PER ACRE. WE HAVE A LITTLE MORE A LOT MORE GREEN SPACE WITH RETENTION PONDS. WE HAVE A CREEK THAT RUNS THROUGH THE COMMUNITY AND. SO WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THE CREEK THERE? I MEAN, WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE IT NATURAL. THERE'S A ONE SECTION AT THE TOP. WELL, THERE'S A DUPLEX AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER THERE THAT WE ARE GOING TO PIPE IT. WE ARE GOING TO, YOU KNOW, HAVE TO WIDEN CROWE ROAD AND IMPROVE IT, JUST LIKE WE DID ACROSS THE STREET. SO, YOU KNOW, CROWE WILL BE LIKE I THINK IT'S A COLLECTOR. SAME THING WITH OAK HILL. SO WE'LL WE'LL BE WIDENING CROWE ON ON THE SOUTH SIDE THERE. AND. SO THE CREEK WILL REMAIN NATURAL IN THE PROPERTY.
IT'S, IT'S WATERS OF THE US. SO WE DO HAVE AN ARMY CORPS PERMIT WE JUST RECEIVED TODAY FOR JUST A PIPING IN THIS LITTLE NORTHEAST, THE NORTHWEST SECTION THERE FROM CROWE INTO ACROSS OUR STREET. AND THEN WE'LL DUMP OUT INTO THE CREEK, WHICH WILL REMAIN NATURAL. DID YOU DID YOU SAY SOMETHING ABOUT OAK HILL HEADING NORTH? NO. I'M SAYING IF THE TRAFFIC, IF THEY WANTED TO GET GO NORTH ON OLD JACKSONVILLE, THEY'LL BE REQUIRED TO GO TO OAK HILL, GO TO GRANDE, TURN LEFT ON GRANDE AND THEN TURN, YOU KNOW, LEFT ON. TAKE THE INTERSECTION NORTH FROM GRANDE AT EL JACKSONVILLE OR UNDER THE UNDERPASS? YEAH, UNDER THE UNDER EXACTLY UNDER THE UNDERPASS. SO WE'LL BE DIVERTING TRAFFIC NATURALLY AWAY FROM CROWE. EXACTLY. AND SO THE DRIVEWAY LINES UP WITH MERCEDES. THE ENTRANCE INTO THIS NEW SUBDIVISION LINES UP WITH MERCEDES, NOT HAMILTON MEADOWS. THAT'S CORRECT. SO IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S GOING TO BE DIRECTLY OPPOSED TO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. IT'S OFFSET QUITE A BIT, MR. MOSAIC, YOU SAID TWO PHASES IS THE ENTRANCE FROM CROWE ROAD GOING TO BE BUILT FOR PHASE ONE AND THE ONE ON OAK HILL, OR IS THAT GOING TO BE IS THE ENTRANCE IN OAK HILL GOING TO BE WITH PHASE TWO DOWN THE OAK HILL WILL BE PHASE TWO. THE INTEREST ON CROWE WILL BE PHASE ONE. EVERYTHING BASICALLY NORTH OF THE CREEK WILL BE PHASE ONE AND EVERYTHING SOUTH OF THE CREEK WILL BE PHASE TWO. WE'RE DOING THAT BECAUSE WE'RE STILL WORKING. THERE'S A LARGE AREA OF FLOODPLAIN IN THE ON THAT PROPERTY THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH FEMA ON RIGHT NOW. SO WE'RE WE'RE JUST GOING TO TAKE SOME TIME ABOUT A YEAR TO HAVE THAT TAKEN OUT. SO WITH THE DETENTION PONDS AND ALL THAT. SO WE THAT'S WHY WE'RE NOT TRYING TO BUILD ANYTHING IN PHASE TWO YET. BECAUSE THE SOUTHERN PORT, SOUTHERN SOUTHEAST SECTION OF THAT IS A LOT OF THAT IS IN FLOODPLAIN CURRENTLY. AND SO WE'LL WE'LL HAVE THAT ELEVATED. SO IT TAKES A LITTLE TIME. SO WE'RE GOING TO DO PHASE ONE FIRST ON CROWE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. MOSAIC. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ARE
[00:25:04]
THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? IF NOT THE. I THINK THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS. IF NOT, IS THERE A COMMISSIONER YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE. ITEM PD 25014.SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED. NEXT IS Z25 017. TWO. ON ON. I HOPE I
[V.5. Z25-017 TUAN ANH VO (935 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE)]
PRONOUNCED THAT RIGHT. I DON'T KNOW. YES, SIR. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A ZONE CHANGE TO BUILD A TO BUILD A DUPLEX. DUPLEX LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF WEST JACKSON STREET AND SOUTH PEACH AVENUE, 935 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE. ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ZONED R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE APPLICANT. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND EAST ARE DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH AND WEST ARE UNDEVELOPED. THE TYLER FIRST FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE IDENTIFIES THIS PROPERTY AS SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM LOW DENSITY. THIS REQUEST WOULD AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE TO BE SINGLE FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED. THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONE CHANGE TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY WITH A DUPLEX. THIS ACCOMPLISHES THE TYLER FIRST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOAL OF ADDING NEW ROOFTOPS TO THE NORTH END. AS OF FRIDAY, AUGUST 1ST, 2020, FIVE. OF THE 16 NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS HAVE REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION AND ANTICIPATE NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON SERVICES AND FACILITIES. BY THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST, STAFF HAS PERFORMED A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE REQUEST AND FINDS THAT IT IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVAL CRITERIA, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? IF NOT, ARE THERE PARCELS HERE YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? IF NOT, IT'S ALWAYS A GOOD IDEA. IF NOT, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THIS ZONING CHANGE. IS THERE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE. WE APPROVE THE 20 5-017. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM.ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED. NEXT IS
[V.6. PD25-016 GENECOV PROPERTIES INC (302 WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD)]
PD 25 016 PROPERTIES INCORPORATED. SHEILA. THANK YOU. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS.THIS IS A ZONING CHANGE FOR PROPERTY AT 302 WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD. IT'S A ZONE CHANGE GOING FROM 80 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO PMD, WHICH IS A. THE PLAN MIXED USE DISTRICT. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND WEST ARE ZONED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND THE AND THE LOCATIONS OF FAULKNER PARK AND DAYSPRING CHURCH. ADJACENT PROPERTIES. TO THE EAST AND SOUTH ARE ZONED PMD ONE PLAN MIXED USE DISTRICT AND ARE UNDEVELOPED. THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE, WHICH IDENTIFIES THE PROPERTY AS MIXED USE CENTER. THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE SEEKS TO ESTABLISH CONSISTENT PM XD ONE DESIGNATION ACROSS THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT SITE. THIS ALIGNMENT WILL INTEGRATE THE REMAINING 0.25 ACRE PARCEL INTO A LARGER, MIXED USE VISION. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PART OF THE PM ONE DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST. IN MAY
[00:30:05]
OF 2019, THE ADJACENT PROPERTY WAS REZONED FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO PMD ONE TO DEVELOP MIXED USE, AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS NOT PART OF THE REQUEST AT THE TIME. THIS ZONE CHANGE WOULD BRING THE REMAINDER REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY INTO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITE. OF THE THREE NOTICES, MAILED NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. ALL OF THE DEPARTMENTS HAVE REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND ANTICIPATE NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON SERVICES AND FACILITIES. BY THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST, STAFF HAS PERFORMED A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE REQUEST AND FINDS THAT IT IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVAL CRITERIA, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE. THANK YOU SHEILA. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? IS THERE A MARK LAVOIE HERE? ARE YOU SPEAKING ON THIS ITEM OR SOMETHING ELSE? THAT'S GREAT. THIS ONE HAS TO. I'M SORRY. YES.FOR THE NEXT THREE FOR THIS APPLICATION. YES OKAY. OKAY. ANY ANY ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF. ARE THERE PERSONS HERE YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. FOR OR AGAINST. IF THERE'S A HAND. OH I'M SORRY. YES SIR. WOULD YOU COME TO THE MICROPHONE. YEAH. WELL IT'S ACTUALLY ABOUT THE NEXT THREE ITEMS, SO. WELL WOULD YOU, WOULD YOU COME TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE, SIR? MR. CHAIRMAN, THE NEXT ITEM AND THE NEXT TWO ITEMS ARE SIMILAR TO THIS. AND PART OF THIS ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. SO I DON'T KNOW IF PERHAPS YOU WANT TO MAYBE HEAR ALL, ALL OF THEM AND THEN KIND OF GET INTO IT OR LET'S JUST HEAR WHAT THIS GENTLEMAN HAS TO SAY AND THEN WE'LL WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE OTHER ITEMS. ALL RIGHT. MY NAME IS RYAN TUTT. I LIVE AT 8501 CROOKED TRAIL, DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT. I'VE BEEN THERE NINE YEARS, AND I JUST WANT TO TALK ABOUT THIS PARKSIDE DRIVE THAT'S GOING IN, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE HUNDRED FEET FROM MY DRIVEWAY. AND, YOU KNOW, ORIGINALLY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THE GREEN SPACE WE WERE GOING TO GET AND BLOCKING THE VIEW. THAT'S ALL IRRELEVANT. THEY'RE PUTTING A DRIVE RIGHT ACROSS FROM OUR STREET AGAINST TO TEAR THAT OUT, TEAR THE TREES OUT, PUT THE GRADING FOR THE DRIVE, EVERYTHING. SO IT'D BE NICE TO HAVE SOMETHING, SOME KIND OF LANDSCAPING OR SOMETHING TO BLOCK THAT VIEW. I DON'T KNOW WHY IT HAS TO BE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM CROOKED TRAIL. Y'ALL ARE GOING TO PUT A MEDIAN IN, SO WHY DOES IT HAVE TO BE DIRECTLY ALIGNED UP TO BLOCK OUR VIEW? AND YES, I MEAN I'M OPPOSED AND. THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO SAY. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHERE WE'RE SPEAKING ON PD 25 016 AT THIS TIME ARE THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. THEIR RELATED ITEMS. BUT WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS ONE FIRST. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE IS THERE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE PD 25016. SIR. SECOND, I'LL SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED. NEXT IS PD 20 5-017 PROPERTIES. GINA. YES,
[V.7. PD25-017 GENECOV PROPERTIES INC (8667 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE)]
SIR. THIS IS A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE. SAME AREA THAT WE JUST DISCUSSED. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR A WHOLESALE CLUB FACILITY, WHICH WILL INCLUDE TIRE SALES AND FUEL AND THE FUEL FUEL OPERATIONS ON AN 11.19 ACRE PORTION OF LAND LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD AND SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND R1, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND PM TWO, AND ARE DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND A MEDICAL FACILITY. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE ZONED AG AGRICULTURAL[00:35:02]
DISTRICT DISTRICT AND ARE THE LOCATIONS OF THE CHURCH IN FAULKNER PARK. ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE EAST, ALSO ZONED PCD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND ARE DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES, AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED PM, SD1 AND IS UNDEVELOPED. THIS IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE, WHICH IDENTIFIES THE PROPERTY AS A MIXED USE CENTER. THE SITE NARRATIVE WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WAS APPROVED IN MAY 2019 FOR A MIXTURE OF USES INCLUDING RETAIL, RESTAURANT, LODGING AND RESIDENTIAL USES, AND ALSO A 15 FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER ALONG CUMBERLAND ROAD TO SCREEN THE DEVELOPMENT FROM THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USES TO THE NORTH. THE PROPOSED SITE AMENDMENT CONSISTS OF AN APPROXIMATELY 104,000 SQUARE FOOT WHOLESALE CLUB FACILITY, WHICH WILL INCLUDE TIRE SALES AND A FUEL CENTER. THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND IN INCLUDES DETAILED LAYOUTS FOR BUILDING PLACEMENT, AS YOU CAN SEE THERE. VEHICULAR CIRCULATION, PARKING, FUEL OPERATIONS, LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. THE SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT FROM THE YEAR OF 2019. OF THE NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR. THE ONE WAS RETURNED IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST FOR TOTAL PROTEST. CALCULATION OF 2.27%. THE OPPOSITION HAD CONCERNS OF AN INCREASE IN TRAFFIC AND NOISE. ALL OTHER DEPARTMENTS HAVE REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION AS WELL AND ANTICIPATE NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON SERVICES AND FACILITIES. BY THE PROPOSED REZONE REQUEST, STAFF HAS PERFORMED A TECHNICAL REVIEW AND FINDS THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVAL CRITERIA. STAFF ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? IF NOT, MR. LEROY, IS THIS THE ITEM THAT YOU WERE GOING TO SPEAK ON? YES OR NO? YES. WOULD YOU COME TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS MARC LEVOY. I'M A SITE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER FOR BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB.WE ARE A MEMBERSHIP CLUB SIMILAR TO SAM'S AND COSTCO, WHERE YOU'LL NEED A MEMBERSHIP TO PURCHASE ITEMS IN OUR CLUB AND TO BUY FUEL AT OUR FUEL CENTER. SO THE FUEL CENTER IS NOT OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. IT'S ONLY OPEN TO MEMBERS. I'M HERE TO JUST SAY THAT WE DO. WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS APPROVED IN THE PD AMENDMENT BACK IN 2019. WE DO HAVE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD. WHEN THAT WAS APPROVED, THE PD BACK IN 2019 WAS REQUIRED TO HAVE A 50 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND WE'RE GOING TO MAINTAIN THAT. WE'RE ALSO SET DOWN ABOUT 20 TO 30FT LOWER THAN WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD. SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A SLOPE AND A RETAINING WALL ADJACENT TO CUMBERLAND ROAD THAT WILL ACT AS A BARRIER FOR NOISE. SO. I'D ALSO BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT BOARD MAY HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? WHERE WHERE ELSE DO YOU HAVE A STORAGE LOCATED? CURRENTLY WE HAVE ZERO IN TEXAS, BUT WE HAVE FOUR CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. IN WAXAHACHIE, GRAND PRAIRIE AND SOUTHWEST FORT WORTH. SO THIS WILL BE ONE OF ONE OF THE FIFTH OR SIXTH CLUB THAT WE'LL BE OPENING HERE IN TEXAS. COULD YOU SAY LOXAHATCHEE? LOXAHATCHEE. YES. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? JUST CURIOUS. SAID THE BUILDING FROM CUMBERLAND, IT'S A COUPLE HUNDRED FEET FROM THE ROAD. IS THAT CORRECT? LIKE WHERE THE SHELL STARTS? IT'S 200, 300FT. OKAY. YEAH. MY QUESTION IS KIND OF ALONG THE SAME WAY. IS THAT THE FUEL STATION ON THE NORTH SIDE THERE? CORRECT. OKAY. AND THAT'S WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. SO THE DOTTED AREA IS THE SLOPE COMING DOWN. AND HOW FAR IS THAT? THAT'S WHAT I WAS. THE SLOPE ITSELF IS PROBABLY ABOUT 60 TO 60FT OKAY. OKAY. WELL THAT LIKE I THINK IT'S JUST A RETAINING WALL 2030. WE'RE GOOD. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A SEPARATE ITEM ON THE ON THE FUEL SALES. BUT. THOSE I HOPE THOSE ARE HELPFUL
[00:40:10]
TO OR THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THE BUFFERING AND THE NOISE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THAT.UNDERSTANDABLE. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. DON'T GO AWA. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY. ARE THERE ANY OTHER PERSONS YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO IS WHO'S WITH ANY ANY ANY THE DEVELOPER? COMMENTS. HELLO, MY NAME IS TREY BREWER, 1350 DOMINION PLAZA. I'M THE VICE PRESIDENT OF REAL ESTATE FOR VIRGINIA GROUP. SO I'M I'M MAINLY JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, BUT THIS HAS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING. WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THEM FOR A WHILE NOW, AND WE'RE EXCITED TO KICK OFF OUR DEVELOPMENT. SO I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
SPEAK TO THE TRAFFIC MEDIANS. ANYTHING YOU GUYS WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. PARKSIDE IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS DEVELOPMENT, FROM WHAT I GATHER. BUT THE QUESTION HAD COME UP ABOUT TYING IN THERE WERE CROOKED TRAIL IS VERSUS A LITTLE FURTHER DOWN TO GIVE MORE. YES, YES. GOOD QUESTION. SO THIS IS SOMETHING THE CITY OF TYLER WAS WAS ADAMANT ABOUT TYING IN THE LOCATION OF PARKSIDE DRIVE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM CROOKED TRAIL TO HELP WITH GETTING AWAY FROM THE BACKING UP TRAFFIC ON CUMBERLAND. IF WE WOULD HAVE WENT ANY, ANY CLOSER TO BROADWAY THAN IT GETS GETS REALLY CONGESTED. WHICH DISTANCE TO BROADWAY? THAT WAS THE PROBLEM. YES, SIR. AND IT'S REALLY TYLER RULES. YEAH. YES, SIR. ANY ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM MR. BREWER? I HAVE ONE FOR KYLE. SO DOES THAT MEAN THE INTENTION IS GOING TO BE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THAT INTERSECTION OR. NOT? AT THIS TIME, I LOSE THE MEDIANS AND THE LIMITATIONS ON, YOU KNOW, TURNING INTO AND THAT THAT SHOULD REDUCE THE NEED FOR A SIGNAL THERE. BUT LIKE MR. BREWER SAID THERE THERE IS A PRELIMINARY PLAN THAT'S BEEN APPROVED WITH THIS THIS ALIGNMENT ALREADY AND THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT. AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH, YOU KNOW, THE SPACING FROM BROADWAY. AND IF IT'S ANYTHING CLOSER THEN THAT DOES AFFECT, YOU KNOW, STAGGER QUEUING AND TIMING OF LIGHTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. IF THERE'S ANYTHING FURTHER AWAY AND DOES, YOU KNOW, UNITS IN THIS PROPERTY MORE AND, YOU KNOW, AFFECTS THE, THE VIABILITY OF IT. SO. BUT YEAH, NO, IT'S NOT ANTICIPATED AT THIS TIME. THAT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY. BUT BUT IF THE, IF IT WARRANTS IN THE FUTURE THAT THAT COULD HAPPEN. YEAH. SO KYLE IS THAT CORRECT. ON IF YOU'RE TRYING TO TURN FROM SOUTH FROM CROOKED TRAIL ONTO PARKSIDE DRIVE THAT'S NOT ALLOWABLE WITH THOSE MEDIANS. AM I READING THAT CORRECTLY? THAT'S RIGHT. IT'S GOING TO LIMIT THE LEFT TURN OFF CUMBERLAND INTO IT. IT'S GOING TO BE LIMITED. LIMITED MEAN YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO DO WON'T BE ABLE TO RESTRICTED. RIGHT. SO WHAT LOOKS TO ME LIKE IS YOU'VE GOT TO TURN IN OFF OF CROOKED GOING EAST AND A TURN OUT OFF OF PARKSIDE IN FRONT OF CROOKED GOING. I GOT MY DIRECTIONS WRONG. YOU CAN TURN THAT OFF. TURN ANOTHER WAY SO YOU CAN MAKE A RIGHT TURN. OR LOOKS LIKE A LEFT TURN. AND THOSE, THOSE TURN RESTRICTIONS ARE, ARE NOT UNIQUE IN TYLER. WE HAVE THOSE PLACES. I BELIEVE THERE ARE SOME, YOU KNOW, I MEAN THERE ARE RIGHT IN RIGHT OUTS AND PLACES. THERE IS, I GUESS INCREASINGLY SOME SOME OTHER RESTRICTIONS ON LEFT TURNS DOING THE MEDIAN AND PLACEMENT. SO BUT I THINK THIS, THIS, THIS ARRANGEMENT WAS INTENDED TO TRY TO MITIGATE HOW MUCH TRAFFIC GETS ON IN WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD AND TO MITIGATE THE NEED FOR LIGHT, BECAUSE THAT DOES THE MORE LIGHT YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, IT DOES SLOW EVERYTHING DOWN, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GET TO BROADWAY. SO IT'S REALLY MEANT TO DIRECT TRAFFIC TO THE OTHER ACCESS POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT STILL ALLOW PEOPLE TO GO WEST. AS NEEDED,
[00:45:01]
NOT TO HAMMER YOU ON TRAFFIC QUESTIONS, BUT IS CUMBERLAND ROAD WIDE ENOUGH TO FACILITATE A U TURN? IF, FOR INSTANCE, TAKING A RIGHT AT A CROOKED TRAIL, TRAVELING WEST ON CUMBERLAND, IF I WAS TRYING TO GET BACK TO BROADWAY, WOULD I BE ABLE TO TAKE A U-TURN ON CUMBERLAND TO GO EAST? POTENTIALLY? OKAY, YEAH. IT LIKELY WOULDN'T BE. I MEAN, I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY PLACE YOU CAN DO THAT. LEGALLY. I GUESS WITHOUT A MEDIAN, BUT. OR INTERSECTION IN THAT STRETCH.BUT IN THEORY, I THINK YOU COULD THERE WOULD BE ENOUGH SPACE TO DO THAT. THERE'S A THERE'S A GENTLEMAN HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK. YES, SIR. IF YOU'D COME TO THE MICROPHONE. OKAY. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. PETE ANDREWS, 315 WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD. AND YES, YOU CAN DO A U-TURN IF YOU GO DOWN AND GO INTO THE BALLPARK, THAT'S WHERE YOUR U-TURN WILL BE.
YOU'LL HAVE TO GO A HALF A MILE DOWN THE ROAD AND DO A U-TURN AT THE BALLPARK. THAT'S WHERE YOU WILL TURN, BECAUSE OTHERWISE THERE'S TOO MUCH TRAFFIC WILL BE COMING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION. YOU'LL NEVER MAKE IT. OR, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON WHAT'S HAPPENING AT THE CHURCH, YOU COULD TURN INTO THE CHURCH AND GO DOWN AND AROUND THROUGH THE PARKING LOT OF THE CHURCH.
THAT WOULD BE YOUR OTHER OPTION. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISTER GENTLEMEN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR YOUR COMMENTS. ARE THERE OTHERS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO. YES, SIR. MISTER CHAIR, GO AHEAD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, BRIAN TUTT 8501 FOR CANTRELL. YES, I'M BACK UP HERE AGAIN, THE SAME THING. I HAVE A SITE PLAN THAT WAS SENT TO US OR SENT TO OUR HOA PRESIDENT. THAT, AND MAYBE I MISSED IT IN THE CONVERSATION ABOUT THE MEDIAN, BUT IT HAS THE MEDIAN LIKE BETWEEN THIS. SIDE AND CATHEDRAL. IT'S DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU'RE SHOWING HERE. THE MEDIAN IS BETWEEN THE TWO PHILOSOPHIES. SO YOU CAN'T THERE BE NO NO WAY TO GO ACROSS THE OTHER. IS THAT NOT ANYMORE OKAY. IS IT WHAT IS PORTRAYED ON THE MAP AS A MEDIAN? IS THAT WHAT'S THERE? WELL, I'LL SAY THAT WHAT'S IN THE SCREEN IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE SITE PLAN, SO IT'S SHOWN AS REFERENCE. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE LATEST AND GREATEST, BUT IT'S NOT IT'S NOT IN THE PURVIEW OF THIS ZONING REQUEST. THIS OFF SITE ESSENTIALLY WILL THOSE DETAILS, WILL THE STREET PORTION COME IN? I GUESS BEFORE BEFORE THE OPENING OF THE STORE? ANYWAY? IS THAT CORRECT OR. YEAH, I'M, I'M SAYING BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER ACCESS TO CUMBERLAND ROAD, SOMETHING WOULD HAVE TO BE BUILDING THE STREET, OR AT LEAST A PORTION OF IT PRIOR TO OPENING THE, THE DEVELOPMENT OR THE STORE. SO WE'LL ADDRESS THAT WHEN THAT COMES BEFORE US. I MEAN, THE, THE WHAT'S IN THE SCREEN IS. I MEAN, YEAH, LIKE, OH, IN OTHER WORDS, PARK SIDE IS NOT IN THIS, BUT IT WILL HAVE TO BE BEFORE IT'S THE ALIGNMENT IS SHOWN IN IN PRELIMINARY PLAT.
AND SO IT'S, IT WOULD BE ESSENTIALLY ESTABLISHED WITH A FINAL PLAT. AND THE FINAL PLAT IS NECESSARY TO START CONSTRUCTION ON ON THE STORE I GUESS. AND SO WHAT WAS I WAS GOING TO SAY THE, YOU KNOW, THE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, THE MEDIANS AND THINGS LIKE THAT IS THAT'S THAT'S NOT UNDER THE PURVIEW OF THE ZONING CHANGE REQUEST OR OKAY, OR THOSE LEVELS. AND THAT LEVEL OF DETAIL IS NOT, I GUESS, PART OF THIS, THIS PROCESS. THANK YOU, GOD.
THANK YOU, MR. CHAD, FOR YOUR TIME. THIS ONE. YES, SIR. YES. ABOUT THE TRAFFIC. JUST WANT TO STATED THAT IT IS GOING TO BE MISERABLE TRAFFIC. IT'S ALREADY TERRIBLE BEFORE THAT EVEN GOES IN. I MEAN, 8:00 IN THE MORNING OR 5:00 IN THE AFTERNOON, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO GET IN FROM WORK OR, YOU KNOW, GO TO WORK. IT'S ALREADY BACKED UP. AND THE CARS COMING OVER THAT HILL, YOU KNOW, BEFORE FALCONER AND THE CHURCH, SOMETIMES YOU CAN'T SEE THEM AND IT'S 35. BUT I MEAN, YOU KNOW, THAT'S ONE OF THE OTHER COPS STATIONED UP THERE BECAUSE NOBODY GOES 35. IT'S PRETTY
[00:50:01]
ROUGH SOMETIMES. SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. ARE THERE OTHERS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SO JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, AND KYLE, I THINK THAT WAS HELPFUL TO UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF IT, IS THAT WE'RE HERE WITH THE ACTUAL THE ZONE WE'RE, WE'RE SEEING, BUT THAT WITH WHICH, WHICH IS IN THE STREET AND THE MEDIANS THAT IS BEING THROUGH THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, THE CITY ENGINEER, ALL THAT IS STILL BEING DONE. AND FOR THROUGH THE PURVIEW THEY'RE DOING IT THROUGH WE TRUST AND THE SAFETY AND TRAFFIC COUNT. SO THAT IS BEING ADDRESSED. AND I THINK I WANT TO JUST PUT A LITTLE SPOTLIGHT ON THAT FOR THE PUBLIC TO SAY. THERE IS PEOPLE WHO DO LOOK AT THAT. AND SOMETIMES THAT'S NOT IN THIS PURVIEW, BUT IT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION AS WE LOOK AT WHAT IS IN OUR PURVIEW. BUT YES, IT IS BEING LOOKED AT. AND I THINK THAT'S THAT'S CORRECT. THEN THERE HAS BEEN A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CONDUCTED. AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS TO. TO MITIGATE ANY IMPACT BEYOND A CERTAIN LEVEL OR BEYOND A CERTAIN THRESHOLD. AND THAT THAT WE HAVE WITHIN OUR ORDINANCE. SO, SO THEN I MEAN, WE, WE, WE CAN STAFF CAN WE CAN TALK TO WHOEVER'S INTERESTED AND KIND OF LEARN MORE, LEARN MORE ABOUT THAT. THOSE RESULTS, THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS. BUT THE PREMIER TODAY IS, YOU KNOW, THE USE OF THE PROPERTY, THE LAYOUT OF THIS SITE. AND, AND WHEN THERE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED STANDARDS, WHICH, WHICH IT IS AND THAT'S KIND OF WHAT WE'RE, WE'RE HERE FOR. THANK YOU CARL. MY CLARIFICATION. THAT'S HELPFUL. THANK YOU ROY THE ANY OTHERS STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE. IS THERE A COMMISSIONER LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE. PD 20 5-017. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM.ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NO. THE ITEM
[V.8. S25-002 GENECOV PROPERTIES INC (8667 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE AND 302 WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD)]
IS APPROVED. NEXT IS P S 25 002 JENIKOV PROPERTIES. THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. YES, SIR.THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR FUEL SALES ON THE 11.19 ACRE PORTION OF LAND LOCATED THERE AT WEST CUMBERLAND ROAD AND SOUTH BROADWAY. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE. THIS IS THE SAME AREA, SO IT'S THOSE ARE THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE FUTURE LAND USE GUIDE. IT'S MIXED USE CENTER. THE APPLICANT PLANS TO DEVELOP THE FUEL STATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE MULTIPLE FUEL PUMPS AND A SMALL KIOSK STRUCTURE TO ACCOMMODATE ON SITE PERSONNEL FOR OPERATIONS AND CUSTOMER SERVICE. IT WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE SITE DESIGNS, SCREENING AND ACCESS STANDARDS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND COMPLEMENT SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED USE FOR THIS PART OF THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IS APPROPRIATE, GIVEN IT WILL BE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SINGLE USER COMMERCIAL BUILDING, RATHER THAN A TRADITIONAL MIXED USE AREA WITH A DEVELOPMENT. OF THE. NOTICES MAIL. NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR AND ONE NOTICE WAS RETURNED IN OPPOSITION TO FOR TO THE REQUEST FOR A TOTAL PROTEST CALCULATION OF 2.27%. AGAIN, THE OPPOSITION HAD CONCERNS ABOUT INCREASE IN TRAFFIC AND NOISE. STAFF HAS PERFORMED A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE REQUEST, AND FINDS THAT IT IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVAL CRITERIA, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THANK YOU SHEILA, CAN I SEE THE SITE PLAN AGAIN? AND SOMEBODY SHOW ME WHERE THE FUEL SALES WILL BE LOCATED ON THIS SITE PLAN. I.
THINK THAT'S THAT'S IT RIGHT THERE. OKAY. THOSE IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S SEVERAL. THIS IS A DETAIL I'M WORRIED ABOUT. BUT THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE IS A ROW OF PUMPS ALONG THERE. YEAH.
THAT'S THE ENTIRE ROW THING. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? ARE THE PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE
[00:55:11]
TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? MR. LAVOIE, YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? NOT AT THIS TIME. ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. MR. TO YOUR COMMENTS. QUESTIONS? YEAH. SO MY NAME AGAIN, WE KNOW WHO YOU ARE. STATE YOUR NAME. YEAH. RYAN TUTT 8501 CREEK TRAIL. YEAH, I GUESS JUST SAY OPPOSITION TO HAVING A GAS STATION RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM US ON THE SECOND HOUSE ON THE LEFT. SO IT'S GOING TO BE VISIBLE. EVERYTHING'S GOING TO BE VISIBLE NO MATTER WHAT.YOU'RE, YOU KNOW, THEY SAY OR WHAT YOU THINK. I MEAN, I CAN SEE ALL THE WAY TO. WAS IT DISCOUNT TIRE COMPANY NOW WITH ALL THOSE TREES TORN DOWN, IT'S IT IS WHAT IT IS. I MEAN, I'M NOT AGAINST THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT I THINK IT COULD HAVE BEEN HANDLED A LITTLE BETTER AND SAY 15FT GREEN BELT. WELL, IF YOU'RE COUNTING FROM, YOU KNOW, THE SIDEWALK AND ALL THAT, IT'S NOT REALLY I MEAN, I DIDN'T TAKE A MEASUREMENT TO IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT PROPERLY GETTING IT OVER THERE, BUT IT SURE DOESN'T FEEL THAT BIG TREES, IT KIND OF BLOCKS IT. I DON'T KNOW, I JUST DON'T THINK IT FEELS THAT NICE. AND HAVING THE GAS STATION ON THE NORTH SIDE, RIGHT ACROSS FROM ALL THE HOUSES, MAYBE IT COULD HAVE BEEN PUT SOMEWHERE ELSE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. CHUCK? WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH A NORMAL ONE YEAR. RULE. IS THAT WHAT IT IS, SHEILA, OR IS IT MORE? ARE WE ASKING FOR A YEAR? THIS WOULD BE INDEFINITE. INDEFINITE? YEAH. OKAY. DAVID. I'M SORRY, I'VE GOT ONE FOLLOW UP QUESTION. SURE. I DON'T KNOW WHO IT'S INTENDED FOR. IS THIS JUST FILLING STATION? THERE'S NO. IS THIS A SPOT WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO GET GATORADE, ETC? OR IS IT JUST GOING TO BE FOR GAS PUMPING, MR. LAVOIE? AGAIN, MY NAME IS MARC LEVOY WITH BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB. NO, WE ONLY SELL FUEL AT OUR FUEL CENTERS. THERE'S NO CONVENIENCE, NO MENTAL SELL GUM. WE DON'T SELL SODA, NOTHING ELSE. SO THEY'D HAVE TO GO INTO THE WAREHOUSE PART OF YOUR STORE TO BUY ITEMS LIKE THAT. CORRECT. WE DO HAVE A KIOSK OPERATOR THAT CAN TAKE CASH, BUT MOST PEOPLE PAY AT THE PUMP, AND THAT'S ALL WE SELL IS FUEL AT FUEL CENTER. THANK YOU. MR. I GOT A QUICK ONE. JUST A CURIOUS QUESTION. HOW MANY PODS OR HOW MANY PUMPS ARE THERE? THERE ARE EIGHT DISPENSERS.
OKAY. THAT ALLOWS TWO PUMPS ON EACH SIDE. SO THERE'LL BE 16 FUELING POSITIONS. AND WE DO ALLOW FOR THREE CARS TO STACK. SO THAT ALLOWS FOR 48 VEHICLES TO STACK WITHIN THE FUEL CENTER.
AND THAT JUST KEEPS THE QUEUES FROM BUILDING UP. SO WE HAVE PLENTY OF CAPACITY CARS TO GET IN AND OUT OF AND INTO THE FUEL CENTER AND THEN PARKING SPACES FOR THE ENTIRE PIECE KIND OF EXPLAIN YOU REMEMBER HOW MANY YOU HAVE SLATED. IF YOU'RE IF YOU'RE GOING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TODD MARTIN KIMLEY HORN ADDRESSES, 110 NORTH COLLEGE AVE, TYLER, TEXAS. WE ARE PROPOSING 453 PARKING SPACES TOTAL FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.
OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. ARE THERE ANY OTHER PERSONS WHO WISH TO SPEAK OR QUESTIONS FOR ANYONE? IF NOT, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT INDEFINITELY. IS THERE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE, WE APPROVE THIS 25 002 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. ANY DISCUSSION, IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED. WE'RE WE'RE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.