[I. Call to Order]
          [00:00:31]
          A BUSINESS IS A ROLL CALL. IS. YES, SIR. MARINA GOING TO DO THAT? CARLENE, PRESIDENT. 
          CLINTON. CHARLES. CRESCENT. PHILIP. HUMBER. PRESENT. CHRISTINA. DAVIS. PRESIDENT. 
          MICHAEL. CARMICHAEL, PRESIDENT. ROY MARTINEZ, PRESENT AND DAVID HUDSON PRESENT. WE HAVE A FULL COMMISSION HERE TODAY. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ANY ITEM HEARD TODAY WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND ITS REGULAR MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 27TH, 2026, COMMENCING AT 9 A.M. IF YOU RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR THIS MEETING, YOU ALSO RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. IF ANY ITEM IS DENIED, THE APPLICANT HAS TEN CALENDAR DAYS TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 
          THE APPEAL WILL THEN BE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST TONIGHT AND PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. COMMENTS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES OR LESS, ALTHOUGH EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE GRANTED BY THE CHAIR UPON REQUEST. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS MEETING, WE'LL HAVE A WORK SESSION TO PLAN FOR NEXT MONTH'S MEETING. AND LIKE ALL OF OUR MEETINGS, ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, AND THAT WILL BE ACROSS THE STREET AT THE TYLER DEVELOPMENT CENTER, 423 WEST FERGUSON, IN THE LARGE 
          [IV. Consideration of minutes from the Commission meeting of April 7, 2026]
CONFERENCE ROOM. NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS MINUTES FROM THE APRIL THE 7TH MEETING. 
          COMMISSIONERS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE. ANY QUESTIONS? CORRECTIONS. IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THOSE MINUTES. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. 
          AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MINUTES ARE APPROVED. THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS A TABLED ITEM FROM 
          [V.1. Z26-002 CASKH LTD (1201 WEST GRANDE BOULEVARD)]
THE LAST MEETING. Z 26002. CASH LIMITED, 1201 WEST GRAND BOULEVARD. WE NEED A MOTION TO REMOVE THAT FROM THE TABLE. SO MOVED. SECOND. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO REMOVE THAT FROM THE TABLE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE I ANY OPPOSED? IF NOT, GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS AND EVERYBODY PRESENT TODAY. THIS IS OUR TABLED ITEM FROM LAST MONTH. 
          I'LL GIVE A QUICK RECAP OF WHAT HAPPENED. THE APPLICANT WAS ASKED TO GET WITH STAFF TO TO DO AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPLICATION FOR A P, C, D ZONE CHANGE REQUEST. MAJORITY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AS YOU SEE, ARE RESIDENTIAL. THE EXISTING PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED RPO, WHICH IS A RESTRICTED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WITH A P, C, D. IT WOULD BE A BETTER TRANSITION INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO FOR THIS THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A NEW SITE OR A WRITTEN NARRATIVE FOR THE SITE. THE RPO HAS A RESTRICTION FOR A MAXIMUM OF THREE PHYSICIAN OFFICES. SO THE REQUEST IS TO ADD MORE PHYSICIANS TO THE THE THE SPACE, THE PROPERTY, THE P, C, D WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE. PHYSICIAN OFFICES WITH ANCILLARY USES COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH MEDICAL OFFICES SUCH AS BUTCHERY SURGERY CENTER WITH NO OVERNIGHT CARE, AND INTERIOR CAFE, RPO STANDARDS AND USES WOULD BE ALLOWED FOR THIS SITE. 
          OF THE 34 NOTICES THAT WERE MAILED OUT, NO NOTICES WERE RECEIVED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. STAFF PERFORMED TECHNICAL REVIEW AND FINDS THAT IT IS CONSISTENT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE OTHER PERSONS HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM OR THE STAFF? YES, SIR. ANTHONY SAMITI TRAINING CORPORATION WE'RE JUST A CIVIL ON THIS PROJECT. 1321 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE. AND IF Y'ALL HAD ANY QUESTIONS. I WAS JUST 
          [00:05:04]
HERE TO SEE IF I CAN ANSWER THEM. BUT OUR CLIENT HAS MET WITH STAFF AND TALKED THIS OUT, AND I THINK WE'RE ON THE SAME PAGE. SO. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? AND THE THE RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL. APPROVAL, OR ARE THERE OTHER PERSONS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION. MR. CHAIR, I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM B26-002. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED. GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR YOUR 
          [VI.1. Z26-006 LORD’S HOUSE (3204 AND 3114 VAN HIGHWAY)]
PROJECT. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS Z26-006. THE LORD'S HOUSE THROUGH 32, OH FOUR AND 3114 VAN HIGHWAY. THIS IS A ZONE REQUEST A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED R-1 A. THE REQUEST IS FOR A PLANNED MIXED PLANNED MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT. 
          IT IS LOCATED ON VAN HIGHWAY. AS YOU CAN SEE, MAJORITY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE RESIDENTIAL. IT WOULD AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE TO NEIGHBORHOOD FROM NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL TO MIXED RESIDENTIAL. AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS CURRENTLY A CHURCH ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL AS A PERSON. THERE. THE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONING CHANGE TO ALLOW FOR A DAYCARE USE AND A LIFE CENTER ON THE. A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. WITH THIS REQUEST, THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A SITE WRITTEN NARRATIVE WHERE IT STIPULATES THAT IT WOULD HAVE CHURCH ACTIVITIES, THE DAYCARE, LANDSCAPING AND BUFFER YARD WOULD BE UP TO RMF STANDARDS AND PARKING WOULD BE PER THE USE OF OF THE OF THE PROPOSED USE, SIGNAGE WOULD BE PMF REGULATIONS AND SETBACKS FOR THE PROPERTIES WOULD BE 25 FRONT AND REAR AND SIDE INTERIOR WOULD BE TEN. VAN HIGHWAY IS CLASSIFIED AS A MAJOR ARTERIAL STREET AND PROVIDE SUFFICIENT ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED USES. OF THE 27 NOTICES MAILED, TWO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR. ONE WAS RETURNED IN OPPOSITION, BRINGING THE PROTEST CALCULATION TO 1.53%. THE OPPOSITION DIDN'T STATE A REASON. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR. IF NOT, ARE THERE PERSONS HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? APPLICANT HERE. HOW ARE YOU DOING? I AM JOE ROGERS, JUST A LOCAL CONTRACTOR ON THE BUILDING COMMITTEE, AND OUR PASTOR'S OUT OF TOWN AT THE MOMENT. HE JUST SENT ME UP HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. IF YOU GUYS HAVE OVER THE ZONING OR CHANGING OR ANYTHING, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? HAVE YOU HEARD FROM THE ONE PROTEST AS TO WHAT THEIR REASONING WOULD BE? OKAY. NO ONE WE HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING FROM. OKAY. SO SORRY ABOUT THAT. NO THAT'S OKAY. SORRY HE DIDN'T GIVE US A REASON EITHER. THEY JUST SAID, NO, I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU FOR YOUR IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ARE THERE OTHERS YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM OR AGAINST? YEAH. MY, IS THIS SOUTHERN STREET ON THE SOUTH END OF THIS PROPERTY? IS THAT USED CURRENTLY BY THE PROPERTY? NO, IT'S CURRENTLY CLOSED. THE TWO NEIGHBORS AGAINST THAT ALLEY USE IT AS PARKING. OKAY. THERE'S A IT'S CURRENTLY NOT BUILT TO A STREET. IF YOU GO TO THE AERIAL PHOTO THAT. IS USED AS A DRIVEWAY FOR THOSE TWO LOTS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER PERSON WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. IS THERE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE Z 26006. SECOND. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS. ITEMS APPROVED. 
          [VI.2. Z26-005 ELENO LICEA (1200 BELMONT DRIVE AND 1201 HIGHLAND AVENUE)]
GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR YOUR PROJECT. NEXT IS Z26-005. ATLANTA LACY 1200 BELMONT DRIVE 
          [00:10:05]
AND 1201 HIGHLAND AVENUE. ALRIGHTY. THIS IS ALSO A ZONE REQUEST. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED BETWEEN BELMONT DRIVE AND HIGHLAND DRIVE. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED R1 B. THE REQUEST IS FOR R1 D MAJORITY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST ARE ZONED R1, B AS WELL TO THE WEST OR TO THE EAST. WE HAVE PM, D ONE AND C ONE. 
          FUTURE LAND USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONE CHANGE TO BRING AN EXISTING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ON THE PROPERTY INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROPERTY DOES HAVE ACCESS OFF OF BELMONT AND HIGHLAND DRIVE. THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALSO APPEARS TO INCLUDE SIMILAR DWELLINGS WITHIN THE PROPERTY. WITHIN THE R1 B PROPERTY ZONED, THE UNIT WILL BE USED AS A RENTAL RESIDENCE FOR THE APPLICANT'S MOTHER, AND THE APPLICANT ALSO LIVES ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE PROPOSED PROPERTY. THE REQUEST DOES ALIGN WITH THE TYLER TOMORROW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. BY SUPPORTING THE ADDITION OF MISSING MIDDLE RESIDENTIAL HOUSING TYPES SUCH AS ADUS. OF THE 70 NOTICES MAILED, FIVE NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR AND NONE WERE RETURNED IN OPPOSITION STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IF NOT, WOULD THE APPLICANT MAKE LIKE. 
          CARE TO MAKE A COMMENT? ELENA LISA 1201 BELMONT THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN, AND THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS. I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THIS IS MORE OF A CLEANUP ITEM, IN MY OPINION. WE JUST WANT TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO REBUILD THE ADU. IF IT WAS TO BE DESTROYED PER CITY GUIDELINES RIGHT NOW, IF IT'S DESTROYED, WHICH IS ANY DAMAGE, OVER 50% OF THE ASSESSED VALUE, WE WOULDN'T HAVE THAT OPTION. AND SO SINCE MY MOTHER'S GOING TO BE LIVING THERE AND IT ADDS VALUE TO THE PROPERTY, WE WOULD JUST WANT TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE. BUT I'M HERE MORE FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. LISA? IF NOT, THANKS. THANKS FOR BEING HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE COMMENT OR SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? IF NOT, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. 
          IS THERE A COMMISSIONER? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE WE APPROVE. 
          C26-005. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE AYE. ANY OPPOSED? GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR PROJECT, LIAM. 
          [VI.3. Z26-004 IGLESIA NUEVA VIDA (712 NORTH BROADWAY AVENUE)]
NEXT IS Z26-004 IGLESIA NUEVA VIDA. MISS HUNTER. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE A ZONE CHANGE FROM C ONE AND RMF TO D BACK. THIS IS LOCATED AT LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF WEST BOW STREET AND NORTH BROADWAY AVENUE. THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE ZONED C ONE LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND ARE DEVELOPED WITH RESIDENTIAL HOUSING AND SOME COMMERCIAL USES AS WELL. TO THE WEST IT'S THE SAME. IT'S ALSO C ONE LIGHT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITH A COUPLE OF BUSINESSES ON THE WEST SIDE TOWARDS THE EAST. 
          IT'S. IT IS ALSO C ONE AND THAT IS THE SALVATION ARMY THRIFT STORE. AND TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED RMF. BUT THAT IS ACTUALLY THE LAGRANGE HOUSE, THE GOODMAN LAGRANGE HOUSE AND MUSEUM TO THAT SOUTH SIDE. THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TYLER TOMORROW FUTURE LAND USE MAP, WHICH IDENTIFIES THIS PROPERTY AS DOWNTOWN. THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE ALIGNS WITH THE TYLER. 
          TOMORROW'S OBJECTIVES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONE CHANGE TO RENOVATE TO RENOVATE AN EXISTING CHURCH AND TURN IT INTO A SENIOR HOUSING FACILITY. THE APPLICANT IS USING THE 9% HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM THROUGH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. AS OF FRIDAY, MAY 1ST, 2020, SIX. OF THE 17 NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST, AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STEVE? STAN? I GUESS THE WATER PRESSURES ARE PRETTY GOOD. OKAY. ARE THE PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? YES, SIR. YEAH. MY NAME IS JEREMY MYERS. I'M THE DEVELOPER FOR BROWNSTONE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF ANYBODY HAS ANY ABOUT THE PROJECT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? THANK YOU FOR YOUR YOUR 
          [00:15:04]
PRESENCE HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? OR AGAINST? IF NOT, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. IS THERE A COMMISSIONER WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE Z26-004. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. 
          ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED. GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR PROJECT. NEXT IS Z 26007. ALRIGHTY, THIS 
          [VI.4. Z26-007 ACM CAPITAL, LLC (1103 ACADEMY AVENUE)]
IS OUR CAPITAL LLC. THIS IS A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, WHICH IS OUR TWO FAMILY DUPLEX TO OUR R-1 SINGLE FAMILY. IT IS LOCATED ON A ACADEMY AVENUE. SORRY. AS YOU CAN SEE, ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ZONED R-2. FUTURE LAND USE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONE CHANGE IN ORDER TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. AS OF RIGHT NOW, THE ARE TWO DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THIS PROPERTY WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO BUILD FROM 25 FRONT AND REAR AND SIDE SIX FOR THE CORNER LOT 12. SO R1D WOULD HAVE REDUCED DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, WHICH WOULD ALLOW THEM TO HAVE MORE OF AN OPPORTUNITY TO BUILD ON THIS LOT. THE LOT IS AROUND 3300FT■!S, SO OUR WIND WOULD BE THE BEST SUITED ZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD ALLOW THEM TO BUILD 25 FRONT, 15 REAR AND ZERO INTERIOR, AND THEN 12 FOR SIDE CORNERS. THE REQUEST SUPPORTS INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND IS IN IS CONSISTENT WITH ADOPTED POLICIES THAT ENCOURAGE THE PRODUCTIVE USE OF UNDERUTILIZED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. OF THE 21 NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STEVE? IF NOT, ARE THERE PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? YES, SIR. I'M MICHAEL NICHOLS, I'M ACTUALLY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. IT'S MADE BY MAN LLC. THEY HAVEN'T CHANGED IT IN THE ARCHIVES YET. 
          THE EXISTING ZONING IS R-2. AND AS THE DIMENSIONS STATED IN THE STANDARDS. 1023 IT'S 94% OF THE PROPERTY. THE SETBACKS. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A TINY SLIVER AND EVEN. AND THERE'S MULTIPLE PROPERTIES LIKE THIS AROUND TYLER. AND MY GOAL IS TO BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSING AROUND 100,000. I'M GOING TO TRY TO BUILD LIKE LATE 80S, EARLY 90S STYLE HOUSES, EIGHT FOOT CEILINGS, BUT PREMIUM. AND I'M GOING TO TRY TO GET THEM DOWN TO AROUND 100,000 BY CUTTING MY COSTS. AND I'VE BEEN IN CONSTRUCTION FOR OVER EIGHT YEARS. ENGINEERING AT TJC, MATH AT I MEAN, I'VE DONE A WORLD OF THINGS, BUT THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE IN CONSTRUCTION NOW IS HOUSING. I HAVE THREE ADULT CHILDREN. THE YOUNGEST IS 19. I CAN'T GET HIM OUT OF THE HOUSE. 
          LIKE LITERALLY, I'M BLESSED AND I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THEM. BUT YOU CAN'T EXPECT A KID OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL WITH A FRESH JOB, EVEN GOING TO COLLEGE, OR A RECENT GRADUATE TO BUY A HOUSE AT $350,000. SOME HOUSES YOU GET MUCH CHEAPER, BUT A LOT OF HOUSES IN THIS AREA NEED TO BE DEMOLISHED, AND I'D LIKE TO BUY THEM THAT ARE FORECLOSED, OR TEAR THEM DOWN AND BUILD NEW HOUSES. BUT EVEN AT R1, D. EVEN AT R1 D, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT 74% OF THE SETBACK IS THE PROPERTY. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A ONE BEDROOM APARTMENT OR ONE BEDROOM HOUSE. 
          AND I'M STILL GOING TO HAVE TO ASK FOR VARIANCES, BUT THAT'S ANOTHER COMMISSION OR ANOTHER. 
          SO IT'S A STRUGGLE TO GET AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND I'D JUST LIKE TO HAVE THE COMMISSION UNDERSTAND THAT. THANK THANK YOU FOR YOUR. ALSO, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. YEAH. 
          I HAVE A FOLLOW UP. JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY. SO WHAT SQUARE FOOTAGE DO YOU THINK YOU'LL BE ABLE TO BUILD? I'VE ALREADY GOT A DRAFTSMAN. I BOUGHT THE PROPERTY UNDERSTANDING THAT IT WAS R1, D AND I WAS ASKED FOR A THREE FOOT VARIANCE OR I THINK TWO FOOT VARIANCE, BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE ORIENTATION OF THE HOUSE. I WAS ABLE TO SQUEEZE IT IN 900 900. 
          NOW THAT IS WITH THE ENGINEERING. THAT'S A ONE. YOU WERE SAYING TWO BEDROOM, TWO BEDROOM. OKAY. WITH THE SIX? I THINK IT WAS A 16 FOOT MASTER BEDROOM, BUT IT'S A SMALLER 
          [00:20:02]
EIGHT FOOT SECOND BEDROOM, SO YOU COULD USE IT AS AN OFFICE. MY GOAL IS TO HAVE LIKE NEWLY MARRIED OR MAYBE COUPLES. SO THE GOAL IS TO BUILD. TYLER. I'VE LIVED HERE MY WHOLE LIFE. 
          WELL, EXCEPT FOR MY MILITARY CAREER. BUT. YOU HAVE TO HAVE YOUNG FAMILIES GROW NEWLY NEW NEWLYWEDS, THEY BUY A SMALL HOUSE, AND THEN YOU BUY BIGGER HOUSE BECAUSE YOUR FAMILY'S GROWING. WELL, THE PEOPLE I WORK FOR BUILD MILLION DOLLAR HOUSES. AND THEY DIDN'T START OFF LIKE THAT. THEY BOUGHT SMALL HOMES. INVESTMENT. YOU CAN SELL THIS 100,000 HOUSE THAT I'M ON BUILT FOR 200 000. I'VE BEEN TOLD NOT TO SELL THEM AT THAT LOW OF A PRICE, BUT I HAVE TO BUILD THEM FIRST. I DON'T. I THINK THAT PROBABLY MORE THAN. ANSWER YOUR. OH YEAH. 
          SORRY, I APOLOGIZE. I RAN ON THERE. ALL RIGHT DAN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AS OTHERS. OTHER QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS. ARE THERE OTHERS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS IS TO APPROVE. SHOW ME. GO BACK TO THE ZONING MAP. I MEAN IT'S. EVERYTHING AROUND THERE IS R1, A AND R1, B OR SOMETHING. OKAY. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. 
          IS THERE A COMMISSIONER? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM Z26-07. 
          SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEM IS APPROVED AND WE STAND IN RECESS.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.