[00:00:01] PICTURE OF. THE COUNCIL. DON'T MAKE HER COME OUT. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WELCOME TO THIS [CALL TO ORDER] MEETING OF THE CITY OF TYLER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FOR SEPTEMBER THE 1ST. [PLANNING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES] THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ANY ITEM APPROVED TODAY WILL BE HEARD BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23RD, COMMENCING AT 9 A.M. IF YOU RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR THIS MEETING, YOU ALSO HAVE RECEIVED A NOTICE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. IF ANY ITEM IS DENIED, THE APPLICANT HAS TEN CALENDAR DAYS TO FILE A WRITTEN APPEAL WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE APPEAL WILL THEN BE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST AN ITEM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. COMMENTS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES OR LESS, ALTHOUGH EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE GRANTED BY THE CHAIR UPON REQUEST. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS MEETING, WE ALWAYS HAVE A WORKSHOP TO PLAN FOR NEXT MONTH'S MEETING, AND THIS TIME THAT WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 15TH AT 130 IN THE LARGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER ACROSS THE STREET AT 423 WEST FERGUSON IN THE LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM THAT AND THAT MEETING, LIKE OLIVER MEETINGS, IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AT THIS TIME. I GET THINGS OUT OF ORDER SOMETIME. I'M GOING TO CALL THE ROLL FOR THE COMMISSIONERS. SCOTT WILLIAMS PRESENT, JAMES WYNN PRESENT, PHILIP HUMBER PRESENT. CHRISTINA DAVIS PRESENT. MICHAEL CARMICHAEL PRESENT, ROY MARTINEZ PRESENT AND DAVID HUDSON PRESENT. THE NEXT ITEM [CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES FROM THE COMMISSION MEETING OF] ON OUR AGENDA IS CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING FROM THE COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST THE 4TH. IF COMMISSIONERS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE. ANY CORRECTIONS. IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 4TH MEETING? SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THOSE MINUTES. ALL THOSE IN [ZONING] FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MINUTES ARE APPROVED. THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS PD 26-017. BAMA. BAMA SAYING THAT WRIGHT LLC. 5304 RUNS QUARTER ROAD COUNT. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. KYLE KINGMAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR. I JUST WANTED TO MENTION FIRST, BEFORE WE GET INTO THE ITEMS THAT, YOU KNOW, HOW WE HOW WE GET TO THIS PROCESS, ALL THE APPLICATIONS ON THE AGENDA WERE SUBMITTED BY THE THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THEY HAVE SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR VARIOUS REASONS. WITH EACH REQUEST, STAFF DOES REVIEW EACH OF THOSE AND PROVIDES PUBLIC NOTICE OF THIS MEETING. AT TODAY'S MEETING, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THE ITEM AFTER HEARING FROM THE APPLICANT AND AFTER HEARING STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON THE ITEM. FOLLOWING THAT, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND ULTIMATELY, THE CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE FINAL DECISION ON EACH OF THESE ITEMS. THE FIRST ITEM THAT WE HAVE TODAY IS A REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-1, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO PLANNED UNIT. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. IS THAT 5304 ROSEWATER ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THIS LOT. ON THIS PROPERTY, THEY HAVE. PREPARING A SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW BY BY STAFF AND BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AS YOU SEE HERE, THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND EAST ARE COMMERCIAL AND THEN TO THE SOUTH AND WEST ARE RESIDENTIAL, IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH AND EAST ARE LARGER LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES. FURTHER SOUTH. THERE IS SOME SMALLER HOMES ON THAT ARE PLANNED. UNIT RESIDENTIAL. THIS REQUEST IS. OR THE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP IN THE PLAN IDENTIFIES THE PROPERTY AS COMMUNITY ACTIVITY CENTER. THIS REQUEST WOULD AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO NEIGHBORHOOD AND RESIDENTIAL. THIS IS. THE CURRENT PROPERTY IS CLOSE. ROMANS CORNER AND LIBERTY STREET. AS YOU SEE THERE. IT'S CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, IT HAS NEVER BEEN DEVELOPED. THE. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED THE SITE PLAN WITH THE APPLICATION AND AS YOU SEE HERE, IT DOES PROPOSE 15 HOMES. AS YOU SEE THERE, 15 LOTS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT WITH SETBACKS. A FRONT YARD, 20 FOOT REAR YARD, 15FT AND THEN SIDE YARDS AND SIX FEET. THE THE THE DENSITY IS JUST OVER FIVE FIVE UNITS PER ACRE. MUCH OF THE [00:05:04] SURROUNDING AREA IS LOWER THAN THAT. THE R-1 ZONE PROPERTIES ARE ON LARGER LOTS AND THEN EVEN THE. YOU ARE. TO THE SOUTH IS LOWER DENSITY. THE. THE DENSITY IS MORE CONSISTENT WITH R1B ZONING. AS YOU SEE THERE. A LOT OF THEM ARE AT LEAST SIX 6000FT■!S IN AREA. HOWEVER, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE FORM OF DEVELOPMENT IS MORE TYPICAL OF A MEDIUM DENSITY. R1 D, WHERE THE REAR YARDS ARE 15FT IN THE FRONT YARDS AND 20FT. IN REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION, STAFF IDENTIFIED CONCERNS ABOUT THE THE THE. THE DEVELOPMENT BEING INCONSISTENT WITH THE. THE ESTABLISHED LOWER DENSITY CHARACTER OF THAT AREA. THERE WERE ALSO SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE HOW THE LOTS WERE ARRANGED AND THE FEASIBILITY OF DEVELOPING IT. AS SUCH, STAFF ALSO RECEIVED NOTICE FROM THE. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200FT. AS YOU SEE THERE. THERE WERE MANY CONCERNS ABOUT THE. THE DEVELOPMENT, LARGELY DUE TO THE. THE NUMBER OF HOMES TO BE BUILT IN THAT SMALL AREA. AND THEN ALSO THERE WAS SOME CONCERN ABOUT A AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THIS AREA HERE THAT IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE THE SITE PLAN. I'LL GO BACK TO THE AERIAL PHOTO HERE. SO THESE TWO LOTS DO ACCESS THROUGH THAT AREA. THERE IS AN EASEMENT THAT I'M NOT SURE THE OWNER WAS AWARE OF. THEY ARE THEY ARE AWARE OF THAT NOW. THE. ON MONDAY, THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A A NEW SITE PLAN FOR CONSIDERATION AND STAFF'S OPINION THAT THE. THE PROPOSAL HERE TODAY IS THE SITE PLAN. YOU SEE BEFORE YOU. THE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THIS SITE PLAN AND DOES NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF IT. IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO PROCEED WITH A DIFFERENT PLAN OR A DIFFERENT ZONING, THEY. THEY CAN RESUBMIT FOR THAT. AND WITH THAT, THE STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION AND RECOMMEND DENIAL. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? IF YOU'D COME TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD. MY NAME IS ARUN CURRY. I'M THE OWNER OF AK ENGINEERING IN LONGVIEW, TEXAS. AND GOOD AFTERNOON TO ALL OF YOU LADIES AND MEN. BASICALLY, WE CAME TO KNOW ABOUT THAT ONE LOT THERE WHERE WE WE, THERE WAS AN EASEMENT ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE NEIGHBORS. AND THAT EASEMENT WILL BE RESPECTED AND THAT LOT WILL BE REMOVED. AND WE, LIKE MR. KINGMA, HAD MENTIONED, WE HAD SUBMITTED A REVISED PLAN FOR CONSULTATION. AND IF THAT CAN BE USED NOW, WE WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW OUR APPLICATION AND REAPPLY. THAT'S OKAY. WELL, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH THE THE APPLICATION THAT'S BEFORE US TODAY. OKAY. AND AS MR. KINGMA SUGGESTED, YOU CAN RESUBMIT, BUT WE WILL NOT ACCEPT A RESUBMITTED ITEM TODAY. OKAY. ONLY THE ITEM THAT'S BEFORE US. OKAY. IS THAT THAT STATISTICALLY, YOU'RE SAYING THAT I SHOULD REAPPLY FOR THE APPLICANT. BASICALLY, THE APPLICATION IS VERY APPLIED. CORRECT. WITH THE NEW FEES, WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS ONE FIRST AND AND THEN IN A TIMELY FASHION. OKAY. YOU CAN MOVE FORWARD. OKAY. BECAUSE THE RESUBMITTED PLAN IS HAS GOT SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS. SO WE'D LIKE TO PROCEED WITH THAT. BUT THEN THIS CAN BE VOIDED IF IT'S POSSIBLE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? YES, MA'AM. PLEASE COME TO THE MICROPHONE. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. THANK YOU. LISA CARLISLE. THANK YOU. LISA CARLISLE, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT THE EASEMENT. WE CAN BARELY HEAR YOU BACK HERE, AND I'M KIND OF HARD OF HEARING. I'M SORRY. WELL, I WAS JUST CONFIRMING THAT THERE IS AN ACCESS EASEMENT IN THIS AREA WHERE THEY SHOWED THEY HAD A HOUSE. YES. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE OWNER IS AWARE OF THAT AND THAT THEY WILL PLAN AROUND THAT. BUT THE, THE, THE SITE PLAN THAT'S PROPOSED HERE. IS NOT [00:10:06] RECOMMENDED BECAUSE IT DOES DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THAT. AMONG OTHER THINGS, ANY, ANY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ARE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THEIR PLANS ARE AT THIS POINT. ARE THEY CONSIDERING NOT PUTTING A STRUCTURE THERE? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT THAT WOULD BE A THAT WOULD BE UP TO THE APPLICANT. IT'S NOT SOMETHING WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH TODAY. GOTCHA. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. THANK YOU. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS JOHN CHEVELLE I LIVE AT 3137 GRANBURY COURT WITH JANIE JONES, AND WE'RE HERE SPEAKING AGAINST THE PROPOSAL. AND JUST, I GUESS AT THIS POINT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THESE ISSUES KNOWN TO HAVE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE DEVELOPER DURING THE PROCESS OF REAPPLYING, AND ALSO TO GET THESE THINGS ON THE RECORD. SO I GUESS A NUMBER OF THINGS ABOUT THE APPLICATION THAT WERE TROUBLING. AND TO MAKE IT EASY, I'VE STREAMLINED IT A LITTLE BIT BY PREPARING A LIST OF THE DISCREPANCIES, AND I THINK I HAVE ENOUGH COPIES HERE FOR EVERYONE. THANK YOU. IS THIS THE LIST THAT WE'VE ALREADY SEEN? ARE THOSE DIFFERENT? THIS IS TAKEN FROM THE APPLICATION AND THE SURVEY. SO THE PROBLEM IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE APPLICATIONS WOULD BE PRESENTED SO EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE APPLYING FOR. AND THE APPLICATION DESCRIBES THIS AS A 3.13 ACRE PROPERTY. BUT THE SITE PLAN DESCRIBES IT AS 2.93 ACRES. THE APPLICATION SAYS THE HOMES WILL BE BETWEEN 2100 AND 2250FT■!S. THE SITE PLAN SAYS THAT 1700FT■!S. THE PROPOSAL IS FOR 13 LOT SUBDIVISION. THE SITE PLAN HAS 15 LOTS AND THEY INCLUDE A DESIGNATED. WHAT THEY CALL GREEN AREA, WHICH IS IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER. THAT IS REALLY JUST A DETENTION POND WITH A BUFFER AREA AROUND THE DETENTION POND. I DON'T THINK IT SATISFIES ANY OF THE PLANNED PARKS. THE APPLICATION ALSO CONTAINS A CHECKLIST ON THE CHECKLIST. THE ENGINEER HAS INDICATED THERE ARE NO PHASES. HOWEVER, ALL THE INDICATIONS ARE THAT IT SUGGESTS THIS IS A PHASED DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPERTY OWNER OWNS ADJOINING PARCELS THAT I GUESS CAN BE SHOWN ON THE ON YOUR MAP. AND HE HAS PUT THE DETENTION POND IN THE CORNER. AND SO IF THE IF THE PLAN IS TO COME BACK LATER ON WITH A SECOND PHASE, I THINK YOU ONLY HAVE TO BE HONEST WITH US NOW AND EXPLAIN WHAT THE PLAN IS FOR THE ADJOINING PARCEL OF LAND THAT HE OWNS, BECAUSE IF THAT'S GOING TO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF WHAT'S GOING TO TAKE PLACE IN THIS VICINITY, THE HOMEOWNERS IN THAT AREA SHOULD KNOW. I DON'T THINK IT'S NECESSARILY HIS OBLIGATION TO DO SO, BUT I THINK IT'S AN OBLIGATION TO BE CANDID WITH THE COMMISSION AND THE OWNERS. IN ADDITION, ON THE CHECKLIST THAT HE PROVIDED, THE ENGINEER PROVIDED THE QUESTION, SAID THAT HE HAD TO PROVIDE A TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, AND HE DID NOT. AND THAT'S IMPORTANT HERE. INSTEAD, HE SAYS, DRAINAGE HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER, BUT THERE'S NO COMMENT AS TO WHETHER THE CITY ENGINEER APPROVED THEIR PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. AND THAT'S CONCERNING BECAUSE. THE TOPOGRAPHY IS SUCH THAT THE HIGH POINT IS BY THE CHURCH ON ROME'S CORNER ROAD, AND IT DRAINS SOUTHEAST FROM THERE. AND UNFORTUNATELY, THROUGH OUR PROPERTY, WHEN THERE'S HEAVY RAIN, OUR PROPERTY IS VERY MARSHY IN THE BACKGROUND. AND SO IF THEY'RE GOING TO COVER 2.9 ACRES OF LAND WITH BLACKTOP HOUSES, DRIVEWAYS, THEN THEY NEED TO ACCOUNT FOR STORMWATER. AND ALL THEY SHOW IS A SMALL DETENTION POND IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER, WHICH IS NOT THE WAY THE TOPOGRAPHY FLOWS, THE TOPOGRAPHY FLOWS SOUTHEAST, NOT NORTHEAST. SO IF THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE PLANS TO HANDLE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BY THEIR SMALL DETENTION POND, I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE MORE FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER. I THINK THEY NEED TO PROVIDE A SURVEY THAT SHOWS THE TOPO AS REQUIRED WITH FIVE FEET INCREMENTS, AND THEY HAVEN'T DONE THAT. IN ADDITION, [00:15:01] ON THEIR ON THEIR SURVEY, THEY SHOW LIBBY ROAD AND YOU MAY GET A KICK OUT OF THIS, BUT WE WENT OUT THERE AND MEASURED IT. IT'S 22FT, FOUR INCHES WIDE AT THE POINT NEAR THE ENTRANCE OF THEIR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, 22FT, FOUR INCHES WIDE. BUT IF YOU LOOK ON THE MAP THAT THEY'VE PROVIDED THE SURVEY, THE SITE PLAN THAT THEY PROVIDED, IT LOOKS AS THOUGH LIBBY ROAD IS ALMOST AS WIDE AS ROME'S QUARTER. IT'S NOT HALF AS WIDE AS ROME'S QUARTER. SO WE HAVE SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RELIABILITY OF THE SURVEY THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED AND WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS ALL DRAWN TO SCALE, BECAUSE IT'S MISLEADING TO SORT OF THINK THAT LIBBY ROAD IS ADEQUATE TO HANDLE THE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC FLOW THAT'S GOING TO BE GENERATED FROM 15 LIVING UNITS WITH THREE BEDROOMS FOR EACH UNIT. THAT SEEMS AS THOUGH AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WOULD EXCEED THE VOLUME OF THE EXISTING ROAD. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NO TRAFFIC STUDY THAT'S BEEN PROVIDED WITH THE BORDER EXPANSION PLAN IN PLACE. WE'RE CONCERNED THAT TRAFFIC COMING DOWN TROOP, INSTEAD OF TURNING ON DIESEL TO TAKE THAT EXIT TO GET DOWN ON THE ROOM'S CORNER, PEOPLE WILL PROCEED DOWN TROOP TO LIBBY AND TURN RIGHT ON LIBBY TO GET BACK ONTO ROME'S QUARTER. SO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE AN INCREASE IN THE VOLUME OF TRAFFIC ALREADY ON LIBBY. AND TO ADD THIS ADDITIONAL 15 LOT SUBDIVISION AND THE TRAFFIC COMING TO AND FROM THAT SUBDIVISION WILL EXCEED, CERTAINLY 22FT, FOUR INCHES, AND PROBABLY SOMETHING GREATER THAN THAT. AND THEN ALSO, THERE'S NO OFFER OF ANY KIND OF OFF SITE MITIGATION. THERE'S NO NOISE MITIGATION, THERE'S NO TRAFFIC MITIGATION. THE PLAN DOESN'T PROVIDE FOR ANY OF THAT. INSTEAD, IT JUST SHOWS THERE'S GOING TO BE A SIX FOOT FENCE AND A 25 FOOT TURNING RADIUS INTO AND OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY. THAT'S THAT'S HARDLY FAIR TO THE NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE TO THE SOUTH IN THE AREA THAT WE DID. THEY SHOULD AT LEAST BE REQUIRED TO PUT UP SOME KIND OF NOISE MITIGATION AND SOME SORT OF TRAFFIC MITIGATION. WE DON'T WANT TO BE SITTING IN THE BACKYARD AND HAVE SOMEBODY CRASH THROUGH OUR FENCE AND LAND IN THE BACKYARD. COMING OUT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND ALSO, THERE'S NO NOISE MITIGATION PLAN FOR. A NUMBER OF NEIGHBORS HAVE SIGNED PETITIONS WHO AREN'T HERE. SOME ARE HERE TO SPEAK. AND WE HAVE THAT FOR YOU AS WELL. BUT THERE'S A STRONG CONCERN BECAUSE THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SORT OF SLEEPY LITTLE HAMLET IN TYLER. AND NOW BY ADDING THESE ADDITIONAL PLANS AND PERHAPS FURTHER PLANS FOR THE ADJOINING PARCELS IN THE FUTURE, IT'S REALLY UNCLEAR WHAT WE WOULD BE DEALING WITH. AND THEREFORE WE ASK THAT YOU REJECT IT, REQUIRE THAT HE COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS AND PROVIDE A TOHO AND A TRAFFIC STUDY IF HE'S GOING TO RESUBMIT SO THAT THE TRAFFIC ON LIBBY CAN BE EVALUATED AND THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CAN BE THOROUGHLY ANALYZED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BEAR THE EXPENSE OF THAT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? IF NOT, THANK THANK YOU FOR YOUR FOR YOUR TIME AND AND PRESENCE. WE WE CAN'T REQUIRE IT, BUT IT'S CERTAINLY ENCOURAGED THAT INTERESTED PARTIES COMMUNICATE. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. DID YOU WANT TO SPEAK? COME TO THE MICROPHONE AND STATE YOUR NAME. YOUR ADDRESS FOR. MY NAME IS BILLY HUNT, AND THE ONLY PROBLEM I HAVE IS THE RIGHT OF WAY OF ROME'S QUARTER ROAD. AND THEY SAY THEY'VE GOT A LOT FIVE. THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD ON THAT RIGHT OF WAY. I DIDN'T THINK YOU COULD BUILD ON A RIGHT OF WAY. AND THAT'S BETWEEN FREDDIE CARLISLE AND BILLY HUNT. AND THAT'S THE ONLY WAY I CAN GET TO MY BACK GARAGE. AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? ANY QUESTIONS? AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? YES, SIR. MY NAME IS DAVID TORRES. I LIVE AT 3145 GRANBURY COURT. AND MY MAIN CONCERN IS YOU SAY UP THERE, AND I BELIEVE YOUR OUTLINE, THE SAFETY AND HEALTH [00:20:02] OF THE STATE AND THE CITY. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CITIZENS? WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH TRAFFIC ON ROME'S QUARTER. AS A MATTER OF FACT, THERE'S TRAFFIC THAT USE THAT AS A RACE TRACK. AND I KNOW BECAUSE I CAN HEAR IT, ESPECIALLY LATE AT NIGHT WHEN THEY ZOOM DOWN THERE AND I DON'T KNOW, THEY'RE GOING 50, 60 MILES AN HOUR OR MORE. AND LIBBY, THERE'S ENOUGH TRAFFIC ALREADY ON LIBBY THAT IS NOT CONTROLLED. AND THAT IS A SAFETY ISSUE FOR ME AND FOR THAT RED LIGHT AT SHILOH AND ROME'S QUARTER. THAT'S A BUSY INTERSECTION. AND EVERY MORNING AND EVERY AFTERNOON, WE HAVE TO FIGHT THAT TRAFFIC. AND BY BUILDING THESE STRUCTURES THERE, YOU SAID A LOT. AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. SO THERE'S A LOT. AND THESE HOMES, I CANNOT SEE HOW YOU GET 15 HOMES IN THERE. SAFELY IN AND OUT OF LIBBY ONTO ROME'S QUARTER OR TROOP HIGHWAY. THE THE MAIN CONCERN I HAVE, MR. MAYOR, IS I'M A RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT. AND I SEE THAT WHAT'S GOING ON IN THAT AREA. AND WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE TRAFFIC. WE NEED TO. I OPPOSE THIS STRUCTURES THERE BECAUSE IT IS THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF OUR CITIZENS THAT LIVE IN THAT STREET, THAT LIVE BEHIND THAT, JUST SOUTH OF THAT ON ON GRANBURY COURT. AND I STRONGLY OBJECT TO THAT. AND I HOPE YOU TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION, BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW, TYLER IS GROWING AND THAT AREA IN THERE IS DEFINITELY HAVING A LOT OF TRAFFIC, A LOT MORE THAN IN PAST YEARS. AND I LIVE THERE. I'VE NOTICED IT, AND I KNOW OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT HERE IN TYLER HAS HER HANDS FULL AND THEY CAN'T, YOU KNOW, MONITOR THAT STREET ALL THE TIME. BUT IT IS AN ISSUE. AND THAT'S MY CONCERN. WELL, WE WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE HERE TODAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS. HELLO. YES, SIR. MY NAME IS REX WILLIAMS. I BOUGHT A HOUSE THAT'S ON THE VERY BACK OF LIBBY, AND MY WIFE AND I ENDED UP MOVING DOWN HERE FROM THE METROPLEX. WE LOVE THE SCENERY, THE BEAUTY AND AND ALL THAT. AND. YOU, LIKE MR. TORRES WAS TALKING ABOUT, YOU CAN SIT THERE AND AND HEAR PEOPLE GOING UP AND DOWN. LIBBY. AND IF YOU WAS TO PUT SOME A BUNCH OF HOUSES RIGHT THERE AND MY WIFE IS ALREADY COMPLAINING ABOUT THE NOISE RIGHT NOW, I CAN'T IMAGINE WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE AFTER THAT. AND IF ANY OF Y'ALL EVER SEEN LIBBY, WHENEVER YOU GO FROM FROM ROME OR ROME'S QUARTER TO 69 OR WHATEVER, YOU HAVE TO WAIT FOR SOMEBODY TO YOU HAVE TO LET THEM PASS BY BEFORE YOU CAN GET IT. I CAN'T IMAGINE WIDENING THAT ROAD MUCH MORE THAN THAN IT IS RIGHT NOW. BUT ANYWAY, I LOVE THE CITY, BUT I REJECT THIS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE GENTLEMAN? IF NOT, AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS? YES, MA'AM. MY NAME IS MONICA HARVEY. I LIVE AT 3127 GRANBURY COURT AND MY HUSBAND'S 88. THIS MONTH I'M 81. I WOULD SAY THAT AT LEAST EVERY OTHER WEEK WE HAVE AN AMBULANCE AND FIRE TRUCK THAT HAVE TO COME INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE WE HAVE OLDER PEOPLE AND THEY FALL, THEY GET SICK. WE JUST LOST ONE OF OUR NEIGHBORS ABOUT A MONTH AGO AND THE AMBULANCE, THEY ARE SO NICE. THEY USUALLY KEEP THEIR SIREN ON AND THEN TURN IT [00:25:05] OFF WHEN THEY PULL INTO OUR AREA TO KEEP FROM ALARMING EVERYBODY. BUT WE HAVE TWO MEN IN THE HOSPITAL RIGHT NOW ON THAT IN OUR LITTLE HALF CIRCLE. SO MY CONCERN, IN ADDITION TO ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN MENTIONED, IS THE SAFETY AND HEALTH OF OUR PEOPLE. I DON'T SEE HOW AN AMBULANCE AND A FIRE TRUCK COULD GET DOWN THERE WITH ALL THE TRAFFIC. WE HAVE SCHOOL TRAFFIC COMING FROM SOUTH OF ON ROME'S QUARTER. THERE ARE SCHOOLS DOWN THERE, AND CERTAIN TIMES OF DAY YOU JUST CAN'T GET BACK AND FORTH ON THAT. ON THE PORT QUARTER ROAD AND GOING DOWN. LIBBY, YOU HAVE TO WAIT SOMETIMES FOR A VEHICLE LARGER THAN YOURS. WHEN YOU MEET THEM ALREADY, YOU JUST HAVE TO WAIT YOUR TURN AND WAIT YOUR TURN TO GET BACK ONTO ROME'S QUARTER OR TO GET ON TO TRIP HIGHWAY. ANYWAY, MY MAIN CONCERN IS THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF OUR PEOPLE IN GRANBURY COURT. THERE ARE 31 HOUSES THERE, SO 31 FAMILIES AND A LOT OF US ARE OLDER. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS LADY? IF NOT, THANK YOU FOR FOR BEING HERE. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? IF NOT COMMISSIONERS? THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DENY. IS THERE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT. DENY PD 26-017 RAMAVARMA LLC SERIES DENY THE APPLICATION AS PRESENTED. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO DENY THIS APPLICATION. ANY QUESTIONS? ANY COMMENTS? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THE APPLICATION IS DENIED. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS PD 262014. COMM CORP OF TYLER INCORPORATED CENTER. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS HUNTER LEACH, PLANNER. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS AN AMENDMENT TO A SITE PLAN FOR A PARKING LOT EXPANSION. THIS IS FOR THE KTC LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWEST LOOP 323 AND RICHMOND ROAD. AND RICHMOND ROAD. THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ON THE LOOP ARE COMMERCIAL AND THE. AND TO THE SOUTH IS A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE TYLER. TOMORROW. FUTURE LAND USE MAP IDENTIFIES PART OF THE PROPERTY. PART OF THE PROPERTY AS NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL. THE REQUEST WOULD AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. CONSISTENT WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY. THE EXPANSION WOULD ADD PARKING, PARKING AND RELOCATE EXISTING STREET EXISTING STREET PARKING ALONG RICHMOND ROAD. IT WOULD EXTEND TOWARD THE SOUTH TOWARD THE ADJACENT R1, A NEIGHBORHOOD A TYPE B BUFFER YARD IS REQUIRED ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE PER THE APPLICANT'S SITE PLAN, THE APPLICANT HAS CHOSEN OPTION C, WHICH IS A THE MOST DENSE OPTION THAT THEY COULD HAVE PICKED FOR TYPE B BUFFER YARD. THE PROPOSED EXPANSION WILL BE SUBJECT TO UDC REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING AS WELL. OF THE 11 NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT HELD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING ON AUGUST 24TH. ONE NEIGHBOR ATTENDED AND EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT LOSS OF THE EXISTING TREE BUFFER AND A POTENTIAL INCREASE IN LIGHTING FROM THE SURROUNDING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. ALL LIGHTING WILL HAVE TO MEET UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIREMENTS. HUNTER DO WE KNOW IF BY EXTENDING THE PARKING AREA THIS WOULD GET THE CARS COMPLETELY OFF RICHMOND ROAD TO THE PARK ALONG THE CURB? THAT PART OF THE BUSINESS THAT'S THERE, THAT WAS THE APPLICANT'S INTENT, IS TO RELOCATE THAT PARKING OFF RICHMOND ROAD INTO THIS NEW PARKING LOT AREA. THAT WOULD BE SATISFACTORY TO GET ALL THE CARS OFF. YES, SIR. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR HUNTER? AND DID I DID I HEAR A STAFF RECOMMENDATION? YES. THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? IF NOT, ARE [00:30:09] THOSE THOSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? I HAVE A YES, SIR. MY NAME IS DEAN CLOUGH. I LIVE AT 4310 CANDACE PLACE. I'M OUTSIDE OF THE NOTICE FOR THE SUBDIVISION BY ONE BLOCK. SO MY QUESTION IS, DOES YOUR PLAN INTEND TO CUT A COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY ONTO RICHMOND ROAD? YOU IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES. THERE'S NO PLAN TO DO IT. IF YOU'RE IF YOU'D COME, COME TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE. PERHAPS WE SHOULD HAVE HEARD YOU FIRST IF YOU'D INTRODUCE YOURSELF. AND MY NAME IS JASON HENSON. I'M THE CHIEF ENGINEER AT KETK NBC, AND RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO INTENTION TO PUT A EXIT ONTO RICHMOND ROAD, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU WERE ASKING. RIGHT. OKAY. YEAH, WE WE WENT THROUGH THAT A WHILE AGO AND YEAH, THAT'S KIND OF OVER WITH NOW. SO THE PARKING IS TO ALLEVIATE THE STREET PARKING AND GIVE US MORE ROOM AND PROTECTION FOR OUR EMPLOYEES. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. CLOUGH? THAT WAS THE CONCERN. WE WERE HERE TWO YEARS AGO THAT THEY WANTED TO CUT A COMMERCIAL DRIVE ON THE RICHMOND ROAD, AND IT'S IN THE ORIGINAL COVENANTS OF IDLEWILD SUBDIVISION THAT NO COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS WOULD BE CUT INTO RICHMOND ROADS. BASSETT FURNITURE TRIED IT LIKE NINE YEARS AGO AND THEY WERE DENIED. KETK WAS ALSO DENIED TWO YEARS AGO. AND THAT'S ALWAYS THE BIG CONCERN. AND YEAH, I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU YOUR PROTOCOL IS TO NOTIFY FOR SIX, 8 OR 10 HOMES THAT ARE AFFECTED BY THIS. BUT THIS IS A SUBDIVISION ISSUE, NOT JUST A HOME ISSUE. I THINK SEVERAL OF US HAVE HAD THIS EXPERIENCE BEFORE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR EITHER ONE OF THESE GENTLEMEN? ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? YES, SIR. IF YOU'D COME FORWARD. I LIVE AT 4400 RICHMOND ROAD. IT'S THE HOUSE ADJOINING TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE PARKING LOT WILL BE AT. I WAS THE MEMBER THAT ATTENDED THE MEETING AND REALLY APPRECIATED KTRK. GIVING ME THE TIME TO COME OVER AND TALK ABOUT IT, EXPLAIN EVERYTHING. AFTERWARDS I WENT HOME AND KIND OF JUST LOOKED. YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE THE TREES AND THE BUFFER ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY THERE. IT CREATES A PRETTY BIG BUFFER BETWEEN US AND HEALTHY TREE AND US. AND JALAPENO TREE HAVE HAD SOME RUN INS IN THE PAST WITH THEIR LIGHTS BEING POINTED TO, YOU KNOW, FAR UP AND POINTING DIRECTLY INTO OUR OUR BACKYARD. AND WE HAD THE CITY COME OUT AND THEY WERE BREAKING. THEY'RE IN VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF LIGHT POLLUTION. AND SO THEY HAD TO SHIFT IT DOWN. THERE'S SOME MORE LIGHTS ALONG JALAPENO TREE THAT ARE LIKE, GO ALONG WITH THE LOOP. AND THEY'RE POINTED AT THE SAME WAY. I REALLY AM CONCERNED THAT I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET JALAPENO TREE TO TURN THEIR LIGHTS DOWN OVER THERE, BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S PROBABLY NOT GOING TO PICK UP ON THE LIGHT METER ENOUGH TO REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE FROM OUR ON OUR PROPERTY ALL THE WAY OVER THERE. BUT THOSE LIGHTS WILL BE SHINING OVER THERE, AND KTRK WILL PROBABLY PUT IN A LIGHT, I BELIEVE IN THEIR PARKING LOT AS WELL. SO IT'S GOING TO CREATE A LOT MORE LIGHT ON, ON THAT NORTH SIDE OF OUR HOUSE, WHICH IS JUST CONCERNING. I WROTE A LETTER TO THEM SAYING THAT I DID NOT INTEND TO PROTEST THE THEIR PROPOSAL, AND ALSO SENT A FEW REQUESTS THAT THERE'S A FENCE THAT IN BETWEEN OUR PROPERTIES, I THINK IT'S TEN FEET TALL AND ASKS IF YOU KNOW, BECAUSE IT'S OLD AND KIND OF FALLING OVER IN SOME PLACES AND ASKED IF DURING THIS THEY COULD PUT A NEW FENCE UP. AND ALSO IF WE COULD EXTEND TREES THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF OUR PROPERTY LINE. AND IF I COULD HAVE SOME KIND OF INPUT, I KNOW THAT THE CODE PROBABLY REGULATES WHAT TYPE OF TREES THEY HAVE TO PUT UP, BUT JUST, YOU KNOW, IN A NEIGHBORLY SPIRIT, BEING COOPERATIVE. AND SO THAT BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT MORE LIGHT COMING INTO OUR PROPERTY. SO IT'D BE IF THERE'S A WAY THAT WE COULD COOPERATE AND FIGURE IT OUT. AND THAT'S BETWEEN US. BUT I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING BACK SINCE I SENT THAT EMAIL. SO MY CONCERN IS, IS IF THIS GOES FORWARD AND I DON'T HAVE ANY REAL LEVERAGE TO CHANGE ANYTHING IN THE FUTURE OF WITH PROTECTING US FROM [00:35:06] JALAPENO TREES, LIGHTS AND THE REST OF THE, THE THE LOOP THERE. THAT I KIND OF GAVE UP MY ONE SHOT HERE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. SO I, I DIDN'T WRITE IN THE MY WRITTEN PROTEST IN THE TIME I'M SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT IT, BUT I DID PUT AGAINST ON THE FORM OUTSIDE BEFORE I CAME IN. AND I'M, I'M AGAINST IT. BUT WHAT WOULD LIKE I WOULD APPRECIATE THE CARS BEING OFF THE STREET BECAUSE MY HOUSE IS RIGHT THERE WHEN I COME IN. THERE'S CARS KIND OF, YOU KNOW, RIGHT THERE ON THE STREET. IN THE MEETING THAT WE HAD WITH THEM, I ASKED IF THERE WAS GOING TO BE A POLICY FOR THEM TO PARK ON IN THE PARKING LOT, AND THERE WAS NO COMMITMENT TO THAT. AND SO I, I ALSO DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A GATE THAT GOES BACK TO THAT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE PLANNING ON REMOVING THAT. IF SO, I DON'T KNOW. I KNOW THEY'RE GOING TO USE A PARKING LOT IF THEY BUILD IT, BUT IT'S A THERE'S STILL SOME UNANSWERED QUESTIONS I HAVE ABOUT. ARE THEY ACTUALLY GOING TO GET THE CARS? IS THAT THE INTENT? THE INTENT THAT I HEARD IN THE MEETING WAS THAT WHEN THEY HAVE GUESTS, THEIR PARKING LOT IS CURRENTLY FULL, SO THEY WANT TO HAVE MORE ROOM FOR GUESTS WHEN THEY COME TO THE NEW STATION TO BE ABLE TO PARK. AND WHICH IS I, IT'S ALL REASONABLE TO ME. I JUST AT THE SAME TIME WOULD LIKE TO SEE IF WE COULD WORK SOME THINGS OUT TO HELP US UP, PROTECT FROM ANY LIGHT POLLUTION THAT COULD HAPPEN BECAUSE OF ALL THAT BEING REMOVED. CAN YOU HELP ME? HELP ME SEE WHICH EXACTLY IS YOUR HOUSE? IT'S THE ONE. CALEB. CALEB. TOOL. TOOL. CALEB. TOOL AND JESSICA. YEAH. THAT'S US. SO WE ADJOIN THE PROPERTY, OKAY. YEP. AND AND THEY'RE THEY'RE GREAT NEIGHBORS. LIKE WE THE OUT OF THE THREE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT HAVE JOINED US. THE THEY'RE BY FAR THE MOST NEIGHBORLY AND COOPERATIVE. AND SO. IT'S A SOFT AGAINST, IF I COULD PUT IT THAT WAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? WELL, WE HOPE EVERYBODY WHO'S AFFECTED BY THIS WILL BE HAVE A RESPONSIBLE ATTITUDE TOWARD THEIR NEIGHBORS. I CAN'T ENFORCE THAT. BUT. SURE. YEP, I APPRECIATE Y'ALL. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER PERSON? YES, SIR. I'M JEREMY ABLES, 44 TIM RICHMOND ROAD, RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO CALEB. SO MY HOUSE IS LITERALLY SOUTH OF CALEB'S HOUSE, SO YOU CAN GET AN IDEA WHERE THAT IS. I REALLY JUST WANT TO ECHO WHAT CALEB HAD TO SAY. MY MAIN CONCERN IS WITH THE THE PORTION THEY'RE WANTING TO, TO DISRUPT, IF YOU WILL, IS THERE'S A LOT OF WOODS THERE. SO I AM CONCERNED ABOUT NOISE AND LIGHT POLLUTION, JUST AS CALEB IS. ONE OTHER THING BEING RIGHT BEHIND HOME, OUR OFFICE DEPOT, I BELIEVE THERE'S THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF BEEN A WAY FOR A PLACE FOR YOUNG KIDS TO KIND OF TUCK AWAY AND PLAY LOUD MUSIC KIND OF IN A HIDDEN SPOT BEING WHERE THEY WOULD CLEAR THAT OUT. THAT IS A LITTLE BIT OF A CONCERN IS IF THAT COULD BECOME MORE OF A, YOU KNOW, POTENTIAL PROBLEM IN THE FUTURE. BUT NOISE AND LIGHT POLLUTION, POLLUTION FROM THE LOOP, AS WELL AS POLLUTION FROM, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE PARKING OVER THERE. SO BUT THAT'S THE REASON I OPPOSE IT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. ABRAMS? ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? YES, SIR. MY NAME IS LARRY HERON. I'M WITH NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, THE PARENT COMPANY OF KTK. I'M IN CHARGE OF THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE. THIS PROJECT. SORRY. THIS PROJECT WAS MAINLY. PROPOSED BECAUSE OUR PARKING IN THAT AREA IS SO LIMITED. THE ONLY PLACE THAT WE CAN PARK ANY EXTRA PEOPLE GUESTS THAT COME IS ON THE STREET RIGHT IN FRONT, WHICH TAKES UP A LOT OF PARKING. WE WERE TRYING TO MOVE OUR OUR EMPLOYEES PARK IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. THERE'S NO PARKING BEHIND IT TO SPEAK OF PARKING. THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, [00:40:04] WHICH IS ON THE WEST SIDE AND ALONG WITH A LOT OF OUR OUR VEHICLES, THE FENCE THAT IS ON THE SOUTHWEST. ENCIRCLES THE AREA WHERE OUR PARKING LOT WOULD BE IS THERE'S A GATE THAT ALLOWS US INTO THAT BACK AREA WHERE WE CAN PARK OUR EMPLOYEES CARS, WHICH WOULD KEEP THEM OFF THE STREET AND LEAVE THAT FRONT PARKING AREA OPEN FOR VISITORS AND GUESTS, WHICH IS WHAT WE WANT TO DO. AND. WE TOOK TO HEART MR. O'TOOLE'S MEMO THAT HE SENT OUT THIS EMAIL, AND WE'RE WILLING TO PUT UP THE TREES THAT HE'S ASKING FOR. THE TRASH TREES, THE BAMBOO AND ALL THAT IS BACK THERE HIDES PEOPLE THAT ARE ARE MAKING A LOT OF NOISE. IF THAT'S OPENED UP, WE CAN GET RID OF A LOT OF THAT. NOW WE'VE GOT PLANS FOR TWO LIGHT POLES BACK THERE. IS THAT. YEAH, TWO LIGHT POLES. AND THOSE LIGHT POLES WILL BE PLACED SO THAT THE LIGHTS SHINE DOWN ON OUR LOT, NOT OUT. AND THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO SAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? IS THERE ANYBODY HERE FROM CEC THAT'S IN CHARGE OF PUBLIC RELATIONS? ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF COMMISSIONERS? STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. IS THERE A MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. 26 PD 26014014. WITH THE EXPECTATIONS OF CCDC, AND HER TEAM DOES COMPLY WITH THE ORDINANCES AND THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. SECOND. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED. ANY COMMENTS? QUESTIONS? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? GOOD LUCK WITH THE PROJECT AND GOOD LUCK TO THE NEIGHBORS. THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS Z26-023. ROBERTO PULIDO AND MARIA DE. SOCORRO. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. I AM ANNA LUNA, SENIOR PLANNER. THIS IS A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED C2, M1, M2, AND THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE IT TO R1 AND R2. THIS IS LOCATED ALONG DUNCAN STREET. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ZONED WITH A VARIETY OF INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL USE. THE FUTURE LAND USE WOULD BE AMENDED TO MIXED RESIDENTIAL. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. SOME OF THAT ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH AND WEST ARE ALSO UNDEVELOPED, AND WE HAVE SOME RESIDENTIAL. TO THE NORTH AND WEST. THE SURROUNDING OR SORRY, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONE CHANGE TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DUPLEXES. AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS THE PROPOSED KIND OF LAYOUT OF WHERE THEY. THEY WANT TO HAVE THAT R1, B, AND R2. THE R1 B WOULD BE LOCATED ALONG DUNCAN STREET AND TO THE SOUTH. THAT IS WHAT'S PROPOSED FOR R-2, BECAUSE THIS IS A ZONE CHANGE. IT'S NOT A A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO ABIDE BY THIS LAYOUT. IT'S JUST THE ZONE CHANGE THAT'S BEING CHANGED. OF THE NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR. IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST, STAFF HAS PERFORMED A TECHNICAL REVIEW AND FINDS THAT IT'S CONSISTENT. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMISSIONER. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE CITY STAFF? IF NOT, ARE THE PERSONS HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS APPLICATION? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DO YOU WANT TO COME TO THE MICROPHONE JUST SO WE CAN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU WERE HERE? JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, I'M ROBERTO PULIDO, AND I WAS JUST BASICALLY SAYING THAT I [00:45:02] WAS HERE. I DON'T HAVE NO QUESTIONS OR ANY CONCERNS. BASICALLY, THE LOTS ALREADY CLEARED OUT. SO WOULD JUST BE DIVIDING THEM AND JUST STARTING ON THE IT WOULD BE PHASES. IT'D BE STARTING WITH THE FIRST TOP FIVE FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES. AND THEN WE'D BASICALLY GO PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO, PHASE THREE, BASICALLY JUST TRANSITIONING DOWN. AND YOU'RE THE DEVELOPER. WELL, I'M THE OWNER. YOU'RE. YEAH, WE HAVE A DEVELOPER WHEN IT GETS TO THAT POINT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ARE THERE OTHERS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM OR AGAINST. AND THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. IS THERE A MOTION. MR. CHAIR, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE Z26-023. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. I OPPOSED ITEMS APPROVED. NEXT IS PD 26-016. EAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL. THIS IS A PLANNED MIXED USE DISTRICT ONE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. IT IS LOCATED ALONG CHANDLER HIGHWAY. AS YOU CAN SEE, MAJORITY OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ZONED WITH RPO, WHICH IS OUR RESTRICTED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE RESIDENTIAL ALONG WITH SOME INDUSTRIAL TO THE SOUTH AND OUR INT, WHICH IS OUR INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THE FUTURE LAND USE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INNOVATION MIXED USE. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROPERTY IS CAN'T BE. SO IT'S DEVELOPED WITH A VARIETY OF FACILITIES FOR FOR THE VETERANS TO THE NORTH, WE HAVE THAT RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICES. WE DO HAVE THE JONES SCHOOL TO THE WEST, AND WE DO HAVE THE RAILROAD TO THE SOUTH AND THEN RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO DO AN AMENDMENT TO ADD A GOLF DRIVING RANGE TO THE APPROVED LIST OF USES. THE PROPOSAL IS FOR A 250 YARD DRIVING RANGE, WHICH WILL INCLUDE A 50 TALL DIRECT IMPACT GOLF NETTING. THE DRIVING RANGE IS APPROXIMATELY 375FT FROM THE SCHOOL TO THE WEST, AND FROM THE RAILROAD IT IS 350FT TO THE SOUTH. THE OPERATOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDRESSING ANY ERRANT GOLF BALLS THAT LEAVE THE THE DESIGNATED DRIVING RANGE AREA. THE FACILITY WILL BE SERVED AS A WELLNESS PROGRAM FOR VETERANS AND WILL ALSO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR A FEE OF THE NOTICES MAILED. NO NOTICES WERE RECEIVED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. STAFF PERFORMED TECHNICAL REVIEW AND FINDS THAT IT IS CONSISTENT AND IT RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER WHEN WE APPROVED A ARCHERY RANGE AND WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE WHERE THE ARROWS MIGHT GO. NOW WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT WHERE THE GOLF. SO HOW THIS PROGRESSES FOR THAT ARCHERY RANGE WE DID LOOK AT TO SEE. THEY PROVIDED A TEN FOOT FENCE OR NETTING WITH THIS. IT'S ON THE YARDS OF. IT'S 250. SO IF IT'S UP TO THE APPLICANT TO TO ESTABLISH WHAT THEY THOUGHT WOULD BE A GOOD SCREENING, DID THE SCHOOL HAVE ANY CONCERNS OR COMMENTS ABOUT IT? NO, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY OPPOSITION. OR I'M SORRY, I'M JUST GOING TO SAY BACK ON THE SITE PLAN, DOES IT SHOW INGRESS EGRESS OFF OF? WAS IT HILLCREST? SO THEY ONLY HAVE ACCESS THROUGH CHANDLER HIGHWAY. OKAY. DOES IT LOOKS LIKE THAT'S A DRIVE. YEAH. THEY OWNED ALL THE WAY TO HILLCREST THERE BY THAT IT LOOKS LIKE. CAN YOU SHOW ME THAT OTHER. BUT I THINK JAMES IS REFERRING TO THIS. THE PIECE THAT GOES ALL THE WAY DOWN TO HILLCREST. I MEAN, THEY OWN TO THERE, BUT THE SITE PLAN LOOKS LIKE THEY WERE SHOWING A DRIVE OFF HILLCREST TO GET IN. I DO KNOW THAT THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER QUESTIONS, BUT THEY THEY DO OWN THAT PORTION. SO THERE COULD BE ACCESS ALSO. BUT I THINK THE POINT IS IT GOES THROUGH A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. JAMES, [00:50:04] THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION. IT'S THE SAME ONE I HAD. THERE'S AN APP. SO SOMEBODY FROM THE APPLICANT HERE, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK, SIR? JUST STATE YOUR NAME. GOOD AFTERNOON. I AM TRAVIS GLADHILL. I'M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CAMP V. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME TODAY. SO AS FAR AS THE QUESTION CONCERNING THE DRIVEWAY ONTO HILLCREST, WE DO OWN THAT PROPERTY THAT IS ACTUALLY INCLUDED IN OUR ALREADY APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE FUTURE HOUSING PROGRAM THAT WE'RE WANTING TO DO THERE AT CAMP V THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SEVERAL YEARS AGO THROUGH CITY COUNCIL. AS FAR AS MAKING SURE THAT THE GOLF BALLS DO NOT ACT AS ARROWS LIKE AN ARCHERY RANGE, WE ARE GOING TO USE DULL GOLF BALLS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE NOT POINTY WHATSOEVER. BUT IN ALL SERIOUSNESS, WE HAVE ACTUALLY DONE A GOLF BALL FLIGHT STUDY TO ENSURE THAT THE GOLF BALLS WOULD NOT ENCROACH INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THAT THEY WOULD NOT ENCROACH INTO THE SCHOOL AND WOULD NOT ENCROACH INTO THE THE RAILROAD. AND WHERE THAT DRIVING RANGE IS PLACED, NO GOLF BALL SHOULD BE ENCROACHING INTO ANY OF THOSE AFFECTED AREAS, UNLESS YOU ARE A LONG DRIVE CHAMPION, IN WHICH CASE YOU WILL BE PROVIDING LESSONS TO VETERANS FOR FREE IN ORDER TO UTILIZE OUR OUR DRIVING RANGE. BUT THE STUDY TO. TO MR. KINGMA, I'M SORRY, THE STUDY THAT YOU JUST REFERENCED, WOULD YOU BE SURE PROVIDED TO THE CITY STAFF? ABSOLUTELY. THERE'S A PORTION OF IT. THERE YOU GO. ONE OF THE MAIN FACTORS OF THIS DRIVING RANGE PROPOSAL IS THE FACT THAT IT SERVES TWO MAIN PURPOSES TO ASSIST OUR MILITARY VETERANS, AS WELL AS TO GENERATE REVENUE FOR A NONPROFIT THAT COULD STILL BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY. ONE OF THE MAIN ASPECTS AS FAR AS VETERANS IS THE FACT OF ALL THE ACTUAL BENEFITS THAT IT PROVIDES. THIS IS FROM THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, WHERE GOLF IS NOW BEING FOUND AS THE MOST PRODUCTIVE AND EFFECTIVE SPORT FOR VETERANS. BECAUSE VETERANS, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE AN AMPUTEE OR IF YOU ARE IN A WHEELCHAIR OR IF YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, A BAD BACK, OR IF YOU ARE PERFECTLY HEALTHY, ALL VETERANS CAN ACTUALLY PARTICIPATE IN THIS SPORT. IT'S A LOW IMPACT EXERCISE, PROVIDES REHABILITATION FOR THOSE THAT HAVE HAD LIMB LOSS, PROVIDES GREAT FITNESS BECAUSE YOU ARE ACTIVATING YOUR CORE MUSCLES IN A NON STRENUOUS ACTIVITY. YOU UNDERSTAND VETERANS, WE'VE KIND OF BEATEN UP OUR BODIES OVER THE YEARS AND WE'VE GOT SOME MILES EVEN THOUGH, YOU KNOW SOME MAY BE YOUNG. MORE IMPORTANTLY IS THE FACT OF THE MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL BENEFITS THAT IT ACTUALLY PROVIDES. AGAIN, THIS IS FROM THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION. GOLF HELPS TO REDUCE REDUCE STRESS. OKAY. DEPENDING ON HOW YOU'RE DOING THAT DAY REDUCES PTSD AND ANXIETY. ANXIETY BECAUSE OF THE MEDITATIVE RHYTHM THAT YOU HAVE TO FORCE YOUR MIND TO GET INTO. YOU KNOW, THE MINDFULNESS REQUIRES YOU TO FOCUS. IT BOOSTS YOUR CONFIDENCE. AGAIN, THAT IS HEARSAY. IF I'M ON THE COURSE, MINDFULNESS OF AGAIN, FOCUS REQUIRED FOR EACH SHOT AND EVERYTHING. THE SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY BENEFITS INCLUDE, OF COURSE, CAMARADERIE, WHICH IS THE BIGGEST THING THAT MILITARY VETERANS MISS FROM THEIR SERVICE. YOU GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET TOGETHER FOR A COMMON THING, AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY'RE REALIZING THAT THEY ARE NOT ALONE IN THIS COMMUNITY. THAT IS WHAT WE OWE THEM. OKAY? THE SENSE OF BELONGING, AGAIN, WITH THE COMMUNITY. AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE SUPPORT SYSTEM WHERE THEY START OFF AT THE DRIVING RANGE. THE NEXT THING YOU KNOW, THEY'RE BOOKING A TEE TIME, YOU KNOW, WITH SOME BUDDIES AND THEY'RE GETTING OUT OF THE HOUSE, THEY'RE BEING PRODUCTIVE. THEY'RE NOT, YOU KNOW, UTILIZING ALCOHOL TO, TO TREAT THEIR SYMPTOMS. INSTEAD, THEY'RE DOING THAT IN A MORE HEALTHY ASPECT. AND THEN OF COURSE, IS THE, THE REVENUE OPPORTUNITY. WE ARE A NONPROFIT. WE HAVE TO FIND A WAY TO MAKE MONEY. WE GOTTA FIND A WAY TO TO KEEP OUR LIGHTS ON. LAST MONTH, WE JUST BROKE AN ALL TIME RECORD. WE ASSISTED ALMOST A THOUSAND INDIVIDUAL VETERANS IN A SINGLE MONTH, OVER 500 OF WHICH WERE BRAND NEW VETERANS THAT HAVE NEVER BEFORE COME TO CAMP V. WOW. SO THIS IS WHERE WE ARE TRYING TO STAY AHEAD, AS OPPOSED TO TRYING TO PLAY CATCH UP. AND BY OFFERING THIS OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR VETERAN COMMUNITY AS WELL AS THE TYLER COMMUNITY, AND AGAIN, ALSO MAKING SURE THAT IT IS BEING OF A GOOD NEIGHBOR. YOU WILL NOTICE ON THE SITE PLAN THAT THE ENTIRE DRIVING RANGE IS COVERED OR I'M SORRY, NOT COVERED SURROUNDED BY TREES. THOSE TREES ARE ALREADY IN [00:55:02] EXISTENCE. MANY OF THOSE TREES ARE OVER 100FT TALL. THE IDEA IS FOR THE NETTING TO BE UP AGAINST THOSE TREES WHERE THE TREE. ADDITIONAL TREE WILL THEN ACT AS NOT ONLY A BALL BARRIER. WE CALL THOSE TREE MONKEYS WHERE THEY THROW THE BALL BACK AT YOU. AND THEN, OF COURSE, IT'LL ALSO ACT AS YOU KNOW, ANY TYPE OF FUTURE LIGHTING UP FROM HAVING A LIGHT POLLUTION, NOISE POLLUTION, THE ENTIRE THING. AND OF COURSE, YOU KNOW, WANTING TO BE THE GOOD NEIGHBOR OF WE HAVE OUR FIRST LEVEL OF BARRIER PLUS OUR SECOND LEVEL WITH BARRIER OF THE TREES. AND THEN OUR THIRD LEVEL OF BARRIER BEING THE ACTUAL SPACE BETWEEN THE DRIVING RANGE AND ANY AFFECTED AREA. ANY QUESTIONS? HOW HIGH IS THE NET, THE NETTING GO AGAIN, THE THE NETTING IS A SPECIFIC FOR DRIVING RANGE. IT GOES UP 50FT MINIMUM. AND SO IT'LL BE ON BOTH LEFT AND RIGHT AS WELL AS AT THE SOUTH END AS WELL. WITH IT BEING 250 YARDS. YOU'LL NOTICE FROM THAT STUDY MOST MEN WITH A 15 HANDICAP DON'T EVEN HIT 250 YARDS. ON A GOOD DAY, I CAN MAYBE HIT 250 YARDS, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE ROLLING ALONG THE GROUND FOR 250 YARDS. BUT THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THAT BACKSTOP NET, YOU KNOW, PLUS THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT AS WELL. AND THE TREE CANOPY AS WELL. WELL, I HAVE SOME I HAVE SOME MAGIC ABILITY TO MAKE A BALL GO UP AND RIGHT OVER STRAIGHT TO THE RIGHT, WHICH THAT WAS MY CONCERN JUST ABOUT. OH, SHEERS. GREAT SCHOOLS. ABSOLUTELY. A LOT OF GREAT STUFF. AND I'D LOVE TO HEAR THAT THERE'S DOUBLE ABILITY TO MITIGATE ANY ANY RISK OF CONCERN. AND THEN OF COURSE WITH THE BALL FLIGHT STUDY, YOU KNOW, AND I'M RIGHT THERE WITH YOU, THE THE BALL MAY GO UP, BUT IT AIN'T GOING TO GO VERY FAR. AT THE SAME TIME, THE HIGHER IT GOES, THE SHORTER DISTANCE IT TRAVELS AS FAR AS THE ARC. THERE'S A WHOLE BUNCH OF MATH BEHIND THIS THAT IS WAY BEYOND. BUT AGAIN, WE HAD PROJECT CONTROL DO A BALL FLIGHT STUDY AND IDENTIFIED THAT AGAIN, UNLESS YOU ARE DIRECTLY AIMING AT JONES BOSHER AND YOU ARE A PGA PRO, IN ORDER TO CLEAR OVER THE THE HEIGHT OF THE BOTH THE NET AND THE TREES, YOUR BALL IS NOT GETTING ANYWHERE NEAR IT. THANKS. CURIOSITY. YOU SAID FOR. ALSO REVENUE. IS THIS GOING TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? YES, SIR. IT WILL ACTUALLY IF IT'S YOU KNOW, MAYBE FOR A SHORT TIME, I DON'T KNOW WHAT ELSE IS PLANNED FOR THE CITY OF TYLER. I'VE HEARD RUMORS, BUT THIS WILL BE THE ONLY DRIVING RANGE THAT IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE SOME THAT ARE AT PRIVATE COUNTRY CLUBS, PRIVATE GOLF COURSES, AS WELL AS SOME THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE THE CITY AT PUBLIC COURSES. BUT TO TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS WILL BE THE ONLY ONE THAT IS WITHIN THE CITY OF TYLER THAT WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS WELL. AND MORE THE MERRIER. I EXPECT TO SEE YOU THERE EVERY SATURDAY. IT WAS. YEAH. ONCE A. THAT'D BE GREAT IF I COULD DO THAT ONCE A MONTH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? LET ME JUST SAY I'VE BEEN HERE A LONG TIME AND THAT'S THE MOST COMPLETE APPLICATION PRESENTATION I'VE SEEN IN A LONG TIME. SO WE'RE THANKFUL FOR YOUR TIME AND PRESENCE. ANY OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, THIS IS ACTUALLY A A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. IS THAT WHAT WE'RE ACTUALLY VOTING ON? YES, SIR. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SPECIFIC SITE PLAN? I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER FOUR, PD 26-016. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. ANY DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR PROJECT AND THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. THANK YOU SIR. NEXT IS PD 26-015. SANFORD RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC. ALRIGHTY. THIS IS ALSO A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED R1 B. THE REQUEST IS FOR A PLAN USE PLAN UNIT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. IT IS LOCATED ALONG NORTH BROADWAY AVENUE. AS YOU CAN SEE, THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ZONED WITH A VARIETY OF TWO FAMILY DUPLEX. AS LONG AS AS LONG ALONG WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THERE IS SOME EMOTION AS WELL. THE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE OF MIXED RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE DEVELOPED WITH A MIXTURE OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AS. AS WELL AS DUPLEXES TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS [01:00:03] THE SITE PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDED. IT PROPOSES SIX DUPLEX, PROVIDING A TOTAL OF 12 DWELLING UNITS AT A DENSITY OF 5.73 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. DEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR IN THREE PHASES, WITH TWO DUPLEX CONSTRUCTED PER PHASE. EACH UNIT WILL INCLUDE A SINGLE CAR GARAGE WITH TEN ADDITIONAL OFF STREET PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ALONG THE AXIS DRIVE. THE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES A 25 FOOT FRONT AND REAR SETBACK, 12 FOOT SIDE SETBACK AND SIX FOOT A CONNECTING DRIVE SYSTEM. DRIVING SYSTEM WILL PROVIDE ACCESS FROM BOTH WEST VENICE STREET AND WEST HARMONY STREET, ALONG WITH FOUR DUAL INGRESS AND EGRESS. THE REQUEST SUPPORTS THE MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING IN THE NORTH END OF THE NOTICES MAILED, NO NOTICES WERE RETURNED IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU. MAUREEN. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? ARE THERE PERSONS HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FOR OR AGAINST? MR. GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS SCOTT MCFARLAND. I'M THE PLAN PREPARER FOR THE PROJECT. ERIC SANFORD IS IN THE BACK. HE'S THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER. I'D JUST LIKE TO MAKE A CHANGE. OR WOULD YOU PUT THE PHONE DOWN? SORRY. I'D JUST LIKE TO MAKE A CORRECTION. THERE ARE ONLY FIVE UNITS, NOT SIX. SO THE DENSITY WILL NOT BE QUITE AS AS SEVERE AS WHAT YOU KNOW, ONE MIGHT EXPECT. BUT THAT'S THAT'S ALL WE JUST THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME PRESENT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THIS GENTLEMAN? IF NOT, THERE ARE OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. IF NOT, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE. IS THERE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE PD 26-015. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE THIS ITEM. THE DISCUSSION. IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? ITEMS APPROVED AND WE * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.